Zhizhen Zhang vs Harold Mayot — Grodzisk Mazowiecki CH Semi-final

Grodzisk Mazowiecki CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Zhizhen Zhang
CHN6
Zhizhen Zhang
#156ATP
1682ELO
1642Hard ELO
$546kYTD
$4.6MCAREER
29 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 August 2022
hard
Harold Mayot
FRA
Harold Mayot
#200ATP
1571ELO
1548Hard ELO
$72kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLWW
Zhang Z.
6-3 6-4
Mayot H.
Zhang Z.
662
Mayot H.
340

Zhizhen Zhang defeated Harold Mayot 6-3 6-4 in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki CH semi-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Zhizhen Zhang closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zhang Z.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Mayot H.

Mayot H.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Zhang Z.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Zhang Z.Mayot H.
24
Serve
—
0
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Zhang Z.Mayot H.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.8
5.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zhang Z.Mayot H.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
56
29
Break points saved·Even
94
92
Break points won·Slight edge
14
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
91
32
Tiebreaks·Dominant
39
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zhang Z.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Mayot H.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.9+94 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.1Hard Elo 1548
6.1Overall Elo 1682
ELO gap
3.9Overall Elo 1571
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.5
Surface form
2.6
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
2.8
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Zhang Z.Mayot H.
Freshness·Clear edge
86
100

Zhang Z.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 21 games (7d) · Mayot H.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Machac T.[5]
Zhang Z.[6]
1-66-36-2
Semi-finals
Machac T.[5]
Mansouri S.
6-47-5
Zhang Z.[6]
Mayot H.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Mansouri S.
Vatutin A.
6-46-2
Zhang Z.[6]
Haase R.
5-76-36-2
Machac T.[5]
Topo M.
7-656-0
Mayot H.
Decamps G.
6-47-60
R16
Topo M.
Rodionov J.[3]
6-47-63
Machac T.[5]
Added D.
6-26-2
Mayot H.
Janowicz J.
6-45-76-3
Zhang Z.[6]
Marchenko I.
7-656-1
Haase R.
Medjedovic H.
6-47-62
Mansouri S.
Kasnikowski M.
6-46-4
Decamps G.
Ofner S.[8]
7-636-4
Vatutin A.
Andujar P.[2]
3-63-3
R32
Zhang Z.[6]
Janvier M.
4-66-36-4
Andujar P.[2]
Sachko V.
6-22-66-4
Vatutin A.
Potenza L.
6-41-66-1
Kasnikowski M.
Alvarez Varona N.[7]
7-56-3
Added D.
Basic M.
6-36-2
Ofner S.[8]
Kielan S.
6-31-66-4
Mayot H.
Marterer M.[4]
6-46-2
Marchenko I.
Kirkin E.
7-616-3
Janowicz J.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-46-4
Rodionov J.[3]
Squire H.
6-36-4
Medjedovic H.
Majchrzak K.[1]
6-46-2
Decamps G.
Krutykh O.
6-746-27-69
Mansouri S.
Mikula M.
6-16-4
Haase R.
Zuk K.
6-36-4
Topo M.
Geerts M.
7-646-1
Machac T.[5]
Zekic M.
6-36-2