Tomas Machac vs Miljan Zekic — Grodzisk Mazowiecki CH Round of 32

Grodzisk Mazowiecki CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Tomas Machac
CZE5
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 August 2022
hard
SRB
Miljan Zekic
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWW
Machac T.
6-3 6-2
Zekic M.
Machac T.
662
Zekic M.
320

Tomas Machac defeated Miljan Zekic 6-3 6-2 in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Machac T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Zekic M.

Zekic M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Serve advantage — Machac T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Machac T.Zekic M.
30
Serve
—
25
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Machac T.Zekic M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
47%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.0
3.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 89). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Machac T.Zekic M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
22
Break points saved·Dominant
98
36
Break points won·Dominant
80
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
68
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
36

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Machac T.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Zekic M.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.5
Surface form
3.1
Fatigue & Travel
7.3
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Machac T.[5]
Zhang Z.[6]
1-66-36-2
Semi-finals
Machac T.[5]
Mansouri S.
6-47-5
Zhang Z.[6]
Mayot H.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Mansouri S.
Vatutin A.
6-46-2
Zhang Z.[6]
Haase R.
5-76-36-2
Machac T.[5]
Topo M.
7-656-0
Mayot H.
Decamps G.
6-47-60
R16
Topo M.
Rodionov J.[3]
6-47-63
Machac T.[5]
Added D.
6-26-2
Mayot H.
Janowicz J.
6-45-76-3
Zhang Z.[6]
Marchenko I.
7-656-1
Haase R.
Medjedovic H.
6-47-62
Mansouri S.
Kasnikowski M.
6-46-4
Decamps G.
Ofner S.[8]
7-636-4
Vatutin A.
Andujar P.[2]
3-63-3
R32
Zhang Z.[6]
Janvier M.
4-66-36-4
Andujar P.[2]
Sachko V.
6-22-66-4
Vatutin A.
Potenza L.
6-41-66-1
Kasnikowski M.
Alvarez Varona N.[7]
7-56-3
Added D.
Basic M.
6-36-2
Ofner S.[8]
Kielan S.
6-31-66-4
Mayot H.
Marterer M.[4]
6-46-2
Marchenko I.
Kirkin E.
7-616-3
Janowicz J.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-46-4
Rodionov J.[3]
Squire H.
6-36-4
Medjedovic H.
Majchrzak K.[1]
6-46-2
Decamps G.
Krutykh O.
6-746-27-69
Mansouri S.
Mikula M.
6-16-4
Haase R.
Zuk K.
6-36-4
Topo M.
Geerts M.
7-646-1
Machac T.[5]
Zekic M.
6-36-2