Illya Marchenko vs Ergi Kirkin — Grodzisk Mazowiecki CH Round of 32

Grodzisk Mazowiecki CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
UKR
Illya Marchenko
#1740ATP
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 August 2022
hard
TUR
Ergi Kirkin
#576ATP
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWL
Marchenko I.
7-6 6-3
Kirkin E.
Marchenko I.
7762
Kirkin E.
6130

Illya Marchenko defeated Ergi Kirkin 7-6 6-3 in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Marchenko I.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Kirkin E.

Kirkin E.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Marchenko I.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Marchenko I.Kirkin E.
1st serve in·Even
56%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.5
3.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (140 vs 147). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Marchenko I.Kirkin E.
Clutch Rating·Even
13
14
Break points saved·Dominant
80
35
Break points won·Dominant
7
33
Deciding sets·Dominant
14
43
Tiebreaks·Even
10
6

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Marchenko I.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kirkin E.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
3.8
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Machac T.[5]
Zhang Z.[6]
1-66-36-2
Semi-finals
Machac T.[5]
Mansouri S.
6-47-5
Zhang Z.[6]
Mayot H.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Mansouri S.
Vatutin A.
6-46-2
Zhang Z.[6]
Haase R.
5-76-36-2
Machac T.[5]
Topo M.
7-656-0
Mayot H.
Decamps G.
6-47-60
R16
Topo M.
Rodionov J.[3]
6-47-63
Machac T.[5]
Added D.
6-26-2
Mayot H.
Janowicz J.
6-45-76-3
Zhang Z.[6]
Marchenko I.
7-656-1
Haase R.
Medjedovic H.
6-47-62
Mansouri S.
Kasnikowski M.
6-46-4
Decamps G.
Ofner S.[8]
7-636-4
Vatutin A.
Andujar P.[2]
3-63-3
R32
Zhang Z.[6]
Janvier M.
4-66-36-4
Andujar P.[2]
Sachko V.
6-22-66-4
Vatutin A.
Potenza L.
6-41-66-1
Kasnikowski M.
Alvarez Varona N.[7]
7-56-3
Added D.
Basic M.
6-36-2
Ofner S.[8]
Kielan S.
6-31-66-4
Mayot H.
Marterer M.[4]
6-46-2
Marchenko I.
Kirkin E.
7-616-3
Janowicz J.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-46-4
Rodionov J.[3]
Squire H.
6-36-4
Medjedovic H.
Majchrzak K.[1]
6-46-2
Decamps G.
Krutykh O.
6-746-27-69
Mansouri S.
Mikula M.
6-16-4
Haase R.
Zuk K.
6-36-4
Topo M.
Geerts M.
7-646-1
Machac T.[5]
Zekic M.
6-36-2