Ugo Humbert vs Mikael Ymer — Vancouver CH Quarter-final

Vancouver CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Ugo Humbert
FRA
Ugo Humbert
#29ATP
1868ELO
1843Hard ELO
$1.1MYTD
$12MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 August 2022
hard
SWE4
Mikael Ymer
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWLL
Humbert U.
5-7 6-2 6-2
Ymer M.
Humbert U.
5662
Ymer M.
7221

Ugo Humbert defeated Mikael Ymer 5-7 6-2 6-2 in the Vancouver CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Mikael Ymer came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Ugo Humbert claimed a first win over Mikael Ymer in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-11-05NextGen FinalsRRhardMikael Ymer4-3(2) 1-4 4-2 4-1
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Humbert U.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Ymer M.

Ymer M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Humbert U.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Humbert U.Ymer M.
64
Serve
—
15
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Humbert U.Ymer M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.8
2.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 107). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Humbert U.Ymer M.
Clutch Rating·Even
70
71
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
90
Break points won·Dominant
37
71
Deciding sets·Clear edge
78
94
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
29

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Humbert U.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ymer M.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0
H2H
10.0
7.1
Surface form
6.7
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
2.2
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Humbert U.Ymer M.
Freshness·
96
—

Humbert U.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Lestienne C.[5]
Rinderknech A.[3]
6-04-66-3
Semi-finals
Rinderknech A.[3]
Pospisil V.
6-46-4
Lestienne C.[5]
Humbert U.
6-44-66-4
Quarter-finals
Lestienne C.[5]
Verdasco F.
6-24-66-3
Pospisil V.
Simon G.
6-17-5
Humbert U.
Ymer M.[4]
5-76-26-2
Rinderknech A.[3]
Berankis R.[6]
7-636-2
R16
Simon G.
Vesely J.[2]
2-66-37-60
Ymer M.[4]
Broady L.
6-34-66-2
Lestienne C.[5]
Koepfer D.
5-77-56-3
Verdasco F.
Galarneau A.
2-66-46-2
Rinderknech A.[3]
Ymer E.
3-67-686-2
Humbert U.
Huesler M.[8]
6-36-2
Pospisil V.
Thompson J.
3-66-26-3
Berankis R.[6]
Diallo G.
6-46-1
R32
Vesely J.[2]
Ritschard A.
6-46-1
Simon G.
Blanch U.
6-47-63
Diallo G.
Bergs Z.
4-66-27-65
Berankis R.[6]
Escobedo E.
2-66-46-0
Ymer M.[4]
Guinard M.
6-36-1
Koepfer D.
Piros Z.
6-26-3
Verdasco F.
Ficovich J.
6-36-4
Pospisil V.
Meligeni Alves F.
7-56-3
Lestienne C.[5]
Lokoli L.
7-57-64
Ymer E.
Uchida K.
7-616-4
Humbert U.
Chidekh C.
6-07-5
Thompson J.
Jarry N.[7]
7-646-2
Rinderknech A.[3]
Ayeni O.
6-747-636-4
Huesler M.[8]
Nanda G.
6-24-67-5
Broady L.
Saville L.
6-46-2
Galarneau A.
Nishioka Y.[1]
5-76-40-0