Marko Topo vs Michael Geerts — Grodzisk Mazowiecki CH Round of 32

Grodzisk Mazowiecki CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Marko Topo
#374ATP
1463ELO
1473Hard ELO
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 August 2022
hard
Michael Geerts
BEL
Michael Geerts
#328ATP
1400ELO
1383Hard ELO
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
Topo M.
7-6 6-1
Geerts M.
Topo M.
7762
Geerts M.
6410

Marko Topo defeated Michael Geerts 7-6 6-1 in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Marko Topo came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Topo M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Geerts M.

Geerts M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Topo M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Topo M.Geerts M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
63%
62%
Aces / match·Even
4.5
4.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (149 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Topo M.Geerts M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
28
9
Break points saved·Slight edge
87
82
Break points won·Even
4
3
Deciding sets·Even
12
8
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
2

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Topo M.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Geerts M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.3+90 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.7Hard Elo 1383
6.1Overall Elo 1463
ELO gap
3.9Overall Elo 1400
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
6.4
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.9
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Topo M.Geerts M.
Freshness·Slight edge
79
89

Topo M.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 35 games (7d) · Geerts M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Machac T.[5]
Zhang Z.[6]
1-66-36-2
Semi-finals
Machac T.[5]
Mansouri S.
6-47-5
Zhang Z.[6]
Mayot H.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Mansouri S.
Vatutin A.
6-46-2
Zhang Z.[6]
Haase R.
5-76-36-2
Machac T.[5]
Topo M.
7-656-0
Mayot H.
Decamps G.
6-47-60
R16
Topo M.
Rodionov J.[3]
6-47-63
Machac T.[5]
Added D.
6-26-2
Mayot H.
Janowicz J.
6-45-76-3
Zhang Z.[6]
Marchenko I.
7-656-1
Haase R.
Medjedovic H.
6-47-62
Mansouri S.
Kasnikowski M.
6-46-4
Decamps G.
Ofner S.[8]
7-636-4
Vatutin A.
Andujar P.[2]
3-63-3
R32
Zhang Z.[6]
Janvier M.
4-66-36-4
Andujar P.[2]
Sachko V.
6-22-66-4
Vatutin A.
Potenza L.
6-41-66-1
Kasnikowski M.
Alvarez Varona N.[7]
7-56-3
Added D.
Basic M.
6-36-2
Ofner S.[8]
Kielan S.
6-31-66-4
Mayot H.
Marterer M.[4]
6-46-2
Marchenko I.
Kirkin E.
7-616-3
Janowicz J.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-46-4
Rodionov J.[3]
Squire H.
6-36-4
Medjedovic H.
Majchrzak K.[1]
6-46-2
Decamps G.
Krutykh O.
6-746-27-69
Mansouri S.
Mikula M.
6-16-4
Haase R.
Zuk K.
6-36-4
Topo M.
Geerts M.
7-646-1
Machac T.[5]
Zekic M.
6-36-2