Alexey Vatutin vs Pablo Andujar — Grodzisk Mazowiecki CH Round of 16

Grodzisk Mazowiecki CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
RUS
Alexey Vatutin
#610ATP
1415ELO
1382Hard ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLLW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 15 August 2022
hard
ESP2
Pablo Andujar
40 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
Vatutin A.
3-6 3-3
Andujar P.
Vatutin A.
33–
Andujar P.
63–

Alexey Vatutin advanced when Pablo Andujar retired 3-6 3-3 in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki CH round of 16. Alexey Vatutin claimed a first win over Pablo Andujar in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-04-09MarrakechQFclayPablo Andujar6-4 5-7 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Vatutin A.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Andujar P.

Andujar P.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Vatutin A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Vatutin A.Andujar P.
1st serve in·Even
66%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
46%
Service points won·Even
59%
56%
Return points won·Even
42%
40%
Break points saved·Even
55%
55%
Aces / match·Even
1.3
1.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
4.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (183 vs 54). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Vatutin A.Andujar P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
0
38
Break points saved·Dominant
18
86
Break points won·Slight edge
32
40
Deciding sets·Dominant
10
41
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
4
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Vatutin A.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Andujar P.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
2.9
Surface form
3.2
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Machac T.[5]
Zhang Z.[6]
1-66-36-2
Semi-finals
Machac T.[5]
Mansouri S.
6-47-5
Zhang Z.[6]
Mayot H.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Mansouri S.
Vatutin A.
6-46-2
Zhang Z.[6]
Haase R.
5-76-36-2
Machac T.[5]
Topo M.
7-656-0
Mayot H.
Decamps G.
6-47-60
R16
Topo M.
Rodionov J.[3]
6-47-63
Machac T.[5]
Added D.
6-26-2
Mayot H.
Janowicz J.
6-45-76-3
Zhang Z.[6]
Marchenko I.
7-656-1
Haase R.
Medjedovic H.
6-47-62
Mansouri S.
Kasnikowski M.
6-46-4
Decamps G.
Ofner S.[8]
7-636-4
Vatutin A.
Andujar P.[2]
3-63-3
R32
Zhang Z.[6]
Janvier M.
4-66-36-4
Andujar P.[2]
Sachko V.
6-22-66-4
Vatutin A.
Potenza L.
6-41-66-1
Kasnikowski M.
Alvarez Varona N.[7]
7-56-3
Added D.
Basic M.
6-36-2
Ofner S.[8]
Kielan S.
6-31-66-4
Mayot H.
Marterer M.[4]
6-46-2
Marchenko I.
Kirkin E.
7-616-3
Janowicz J.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-46-4
Rodionov J.[3]
Squire H.
6-36-4
Medjedovic H.
Majchrzak K.[1]
6-46-2
Decamps G.
Krutykh O.
6-746-27-69
Mansouri S.
Mikula M.
6-16-4
Haase R.
Zuk K.
6-36-4
Topo M.
Geerts M.
7-646-1
Machac T.[5]
Zekic M.
6-36-2