Clement Tabur vs Mats Moraing — Meerbusch CH Quarter-final

Meerbusch CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Clement Tabur
FRA
Clement Tabur
#178ATP
1607ELO
1553Clay ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWLLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 August 2022
clay
GER7
Mats Moraing
34 yrs · 198 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLW
Tabur C.
6-4 6-0
Moraing M.
Tabur C.
662
Moraing M.
400

Clement Tabur defeated Mats Moraing 6-4 6-0 in the Meerbusch CH quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Mats Moraing came in defending last year's quarter-final, but Clement Tabur had been the form player, winning 3 of their last 5 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tabur C.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Moraing M.

Moraing M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Serve advantage — Tabur C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tabur C.Moraing M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
75%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
45%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
36%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.2
8.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (189 vs 64). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tabur C.Moraing M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
32
40
Break points saved·Clear edge
74
86
Break points won·Slight edge
23
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
40
66
Tiebreaks·Dominant
45
18

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tabur C.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Moraing M.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.5
Surface form
2.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
9.2
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tabur C.Moraing M.
Freshness·
55
—

Tabur C.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 100 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Novak D.
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Tabur C.
6-46-0
Novak D.
Bonadio R.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Bonadio R.
Forejtek J.
6-46-3
Tabur C.
Moraing M.[7]
6-46-0
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Nagal S.
6-21-67-5
Novak D.
Dzumhur D.
6-16-3
R16
Bonadio R.
Shevchenko A.
7-54-67-5
Dzumhur D.
Andreev A.
6-46-2
Tabur C.
Hanfmann Y.[4]
6-42-66-3
Moraing M.[7]
Milojevic N.
6-756-26-2
Novak D.
Struff J.[3]
1-66-46-4
Forejtek J.
Coppejans K.
6-746-46-4
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Krutykh O.
6-16-2
Nagal S.
Arnaboldi A.
7-57-63
R32
Coppejans K.
Lopez Montagud C.
6-21-0
Andreev A.
Squire H.
6-26-4
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Rehberg M.
6-46-2
Krutykh O.
Topo M.
3-66-16-2
Bonadio R.
Agamenone F.[2]
6-11-66-3
Forejtek J.
Marterer M.[8]
6-37-64
Novak D.
Kopriva V.
6-746-27-5
Tabur C.
Klein L.
6-42-67-66
Hanfmann Y.[4]
Vatutin A.
6-26-2
Arnaboldi A.
Blancaneaux G.[6]
7-56-1
Milojevic N.
Horansky F.
6-26-1
Struff J.[3]
Molleker R.
7-56-0
Moraing M.[7]
Gerch L.
4-66-46-4
Nagal S.
Added D.
7-616-3
Shevchenko A.
Ferreira Silva F.
4-66-36-3
Dzumhur D.
Rodionov J.[5]
6-46-3