Aidan Mchugh vs Li Tu — Chicago CH Qualifying Round 2

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
GBR9
Aidan Mchugh
#489ATP
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 8 August 2022
hard
AUS5
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Mchugh A.
7-6 3-6 6-3
Tu L.
Mchugh A.
77362
Tu L.
63631

Aidan Mchugh defeated Li Tu 7-6 3-6 6-3 in the Chicago CH qualifying round 2 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Aidan Mchugh closed it out in three sets, 7–6 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mchugh A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Tu L.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Mchugh A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mchugh A.Tu L.
1st serve in·Even
65%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.2
6.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (93 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mchugh A.Tu L.
Clutch Rating·Even
23
27
Break points saved·Slight edge
72
82
Break points won·Even
5
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
49
20
Tiebreaks·Dominant
11
64

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mchugh A.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Tu L.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
3.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
6.7
0.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q2
Mchugh A.[9]
Tu L.[5]
7-633-66-3
Harris B.[6]
Sandgren T.[11]
6-47-69
Harrison R.
Dougaz A.[12]
6-36-4
Smith K.
Zhu E.[7]
6-36-4
Holt B.[8]
Dostanic S.
6-36-4
Couacaud E.[1]
Svajda Z.[10]
6-36-2
Q1
Harris B.[6]
Ochi M.
7-636-2
Zhu E.[7]
Habib H.
6-26-4
Harrison R.
Watanuki Y.[4]
2-67-637-612
Holt B.[8]
Martin A.
6-46-3
Dostanic S.
King E.
6-06-4
Sandgren T.[11]
Brymer G.
6-46-4
Mchugh A.[9]
Young D.
6-37-63
Tu L.[5]
Patten H.
6-46-4
Dougaz A.[12]
Mochizuki S.
7-56-2
Smith K.
Cash J.
7-646-4
Svajda Z.[10]
Kirchheimer S.
4-66-26-4
Couacaud E.[1]
Chung Y.
6-46-2