Mikhail Kukushkin vs Govind Nanda — Chicago CH Round of 32

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Mikhail Kukushkin
KAZ
Mikhail Kukushkin
#316ATP
1552ELO
1526Hard ELO
38 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 8 August 2022
hard
USA
Govind Nanda
#781ATP
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWWLW
Kukushkin M.
3-6 6-4 6-3
Nanda G.
Kukushkin M.
3662
Nanda G.
6431

Mikhail Kukushkin defeated Govind Nanda 3-6 6-4 6-3 in the Chicago CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kukushkin M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Nanda G.

Nanda G.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Kukushkin M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kukushkin M.Nanda G.
1st serve in·Even
66%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
65%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
48%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
38%
41%
Break points saved·Even
61%
57%
Aces / match·Even
2.9
2.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.1
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 86). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kukushkin M.Nanda G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
46
5
Break points saved·Dominant
93
38
Break points won·Clear edge
41
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
41
15
Tiebreaks·
44
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kukushkin M.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Nanda G.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.9
Surface form
4.8
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
3.3
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Safiullin R.[7]
Shelton B.
6-34-67-5
Semi-finals
Safiullin R.[7]
Albot R.[5]
7-56-3
Shelton B.
Brouwer G.
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Brouwer G.
Broady L.
6-26-4
Safiullin R.[7]
Svajda Z.
6-36-746-3
Shelton B.
Thompson J.[4]
7-6126-4
Albot R.[5]
Gojo B.
4-66-26-4
R16
Thompson J.[4]
Harrison R.
6-36-3
Shelton B.
Harris B.
6-36-2
Albot R.[5]
Escoffier A.
6-46-2
Gojo B.
Kukushkin M.
6-36-716-1
Brouwer G.
Oconnell C.[2]
7-56-4
Broady L.
Holt B.
6-44-66-4
Svajda Z.
Escobedo E.
6-46-2
Safiullin R.[7]
Olivieri G.
6-44-66-0
R32
Holt B.
Ritschard A.
4-66-26-2
Shelton B.
Popko D.
6-07-65
Harris B.
Kovacevic A.
6-34-66-3
Safiullin R.[7]
Krueger M.
6-36-3
Olivieri G.
Svrcina D.
4-66-46-3
Svajda Z.
Mchugh A.
6-46-2
Escobedo E.
Kozlov S.[3]
6-47-62
Escoffier A.
Uchida K.
7-656-3
Gojo B.
Laaksonen H.[1]
3-67-656-4
Brouwer G.
Smith K.
6-36-4
Kukushkin M.
Nanda G.
3-66-46-3
Oconnell C.[2]
Zhu E.
6-36-4
Broady L.
Tu L.
6-36-2
Thompson J.[4]
Jubb P.
7-686-756-3
Albot R.[5]
Couacaud E.
6-26-3
Harrison R.
Eubanks C.
7-657-69