Mats Moraing vs Lucas Gerch — Meerbusch CH Round of 32

Meerbusch CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER7
Mats Moraing
34 yrs · 198 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 8 August 2022
clay
GER
Lucas Gerch
#914ATP
31 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWWW
Moraing M.
4-6 6-4 6-4
Gerch L.
Moraing M.
4662
Gerch L.
6441

Mats Moraing defeated Lucas Gerch 4-6 6-4 6-4 in the Meerbusch CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Mats Moraing came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Moraing M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Gerch L.

Gerch L.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Moraing M.

Serve advantage — Gerch L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Moraing M.Gerch L.
1st serve in·Even
57%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.0
3.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
4.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (64 vs 107). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Moraing M.Gerch L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
40
0
Break points saved·Dominant
86
27
Break points won·Slight edge
18
11
Deciding sets·Dominant
66
18
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
18
32

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Moraing M.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gerch L.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.0
Surface form
5.1
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
7.4
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Novak D.
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Tabur C.
6-46-0
Novak D.
Bonadio R.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Bonadio R.
Forejtek J.
6-46-3
Tabur C.
Moraing M.[7]
6-46-0
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Nagal S.
6-21-67-5
Novak D.
Dzumhur D.
6-16-3
R16
Bonadio R.
Shevchenko A.
7-54-67-5
Dzumhur D.
Andreev A.
6-46-2
Tabur C.
Hanfmann Y.[4]
6-42-66-3
Moraing M.[7]
Milojevic N.
6-756-26-2
Novak D.
Struff J.[3]
1-66-46-4
Forejtek J.
Coppejans K.
6-746-46-4
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Krutykh O.
6-16-2
Nagal S.
Arnaboldi A.
7-57-63
R32
Coppejans K.
Lopez Montagud C.
6-21-0
Andreev A.
Squire H.
6-26-4
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Rehberg M.
6-46-2
Krutykh O.
Topo M.
3-66-16-2
Bonadio R.
Agamenone F.[2]
6-11-66-3
Forejtek J.
Marterer M.[8]
6-37-64
Novak D.
Kopriva V.
6-746-27-5
Tabur C.
Klein L.
6-42-67-66
Hanfmann Y.[4]
Vatutin A.
6-26-2
Arnaboldi A.
Blancaneaux G.[6]
7-56-1
Milojevic N.
Horansky F.
6-26-1
Struff J.[3]
Molleker R.
7-56-0
Moraing M.[7]
Gerch L.
4-66-46-4
Nagal S.
Added D.
7-616-3
Shevchenko A.
Ferreira Silva F.
4-66-36-3
Dzumhur D.
Rodionov J.[5]
6-46-3