Damir Dzumhur vs Jurij Rodionov — Meerbusch CH Round of 32

Meerbusch CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Damir Dzumhur
BIH
Damir Dzumhur
#108ATP
1638ELO
1594Clay ELO
$528kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
34 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 August 2022
clay
Jurij Rodionov
AUT5
Jurij Rodionov
#143ATP
1636ELO
1586Clay ELO
$205kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
27 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWWL
Dzumhur D.
6-4 6-3
Rodionov J.
Dzumhur D.
662
Rodionov J.
430

Damir Dzumhur defeated Jurij Rodionov 6-4 6-3 in the Meerbusch CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Damir Dzumhur came in ranked #108, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Damir Dzumhur closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Dzumhur D.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Rodionov J.

Rodionov J.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Dzumhur D.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Dzumhur D.Rodionov J.
0
Serve
—
53
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Dzumhur D.Rodionov J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
41%
38%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.1
5.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Dzumhur D.Rodionov J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
70
40
Break points saved·Even
87
89
Break points won·Dominant
64
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
80
45
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
70
54

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Dzumhur D.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Rodionov J.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.8+8 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.2Clay Elo 1586
5.5Overall Elo 1638
ELO gap
4.5Overall Elo 1636
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.9
Surface form
4.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
6.9
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Dzumhur D.Rodionov J.
Freshness·Even
76
75

Dzumhur D.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 58 games (7d) · Rodionov J.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 32 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Novak D.
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Tabur C.
6-46-0
Novak D.
Bonadio R.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Bonadio R.
Forejtek J.
6-46-3
Tabur C.
Moraing M.[7]
6-46-0
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Nagal S.
6-21-67-5
Novak D.
Dzumhur D.
6-16-3
R16
Bonadio R.
Shevchenko A.
7-54-67-5
Dzumhur D.
Andreev A.
6-46-2
Tabur C.
Hanfmann Y.[4]
6-42-66-3
Moraing M.[7]
Milojevic N.
6-756-26-2
Novak D.
Struff J.[3]
1-66-46-4
Forejtek J.
Coppejans K.
6-746-46-4
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Krutykh O.
6-16-2
Nagal S.
Arnaboldi A.
7-57-63
R32
Coppejans K.
Lopez Montagud C.
6-21-0
Andreev A.
Squire H.
6-26-4
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Rehberg M.
6-46-2
Krutykh O.
Topo M.
3-66-16-2
Bonadio R.
Agamenone F.[2]
6-11-66-3
Forejtek J.
Marterer M.[8]
6-37-64
Novak D.
Kopriva V.
6-746-27-5
Tabur C.
Klein L.
6-42-67-66
Hanfmann Y.[4]
Vatutin A.
6-26-2
Arnaboldi A.
Blancaneaux G.[6]
7-56-1
Milojevic N.
Horansky F.
6-26-1
Struff J.[3]
Molleker R.
7-56-0
Moraing M.[7]
Gerch L.
4-66-46-4
Nagal S.
Added D.
7-616-3
Shevchenko A.
Ferreira Silva F.
4-66-36-3
Dzumhur D.
Rodionov J.[5]
6-46-3