Jonas Forejtek vs Kimmer Coppejans — Meerbusch CH Round of 16

Meerbusch CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Jonas Forejtek
CZE
Jonas Forejtek
#312ATP
1387ELO
1364Clay ELO
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 8 August 2022
clay
Kimmer Coppejans
BEL
Kimmer Coppejans
#199ATP
1544ELO
1513Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLWW
Forejtek J.
6-7 6-4 6-4
Coppejans K.
Forejtek J.
64662
Coppejans K.
77441

Jonas Forejtek defeated Kimmer Coppejans 6-7 6-4 6-4 in the Meerbusch CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Kimmer Coppejans came in ranked #199, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Forejtek J.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Coppejans K.

Coppejans K.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Forejtek J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Forejtek J.Coppejans K.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
42%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Even
4.2
3.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.5
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (166 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Forejtek J.Coppejans K.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
10
44
Break points saved·Slight edge
78
67
Break points won·Clear edge
6
29
Deciding sets·Dominant
7
74
Tiebreaks·Dominant
15
43

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Forejtek J.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Coppejans K.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.8Clay Elo 1364
Surface ELO
6.2+150 Clay Elo edge
3.6Overall Elo 1387
ELO gap
6.4Overall Elo 1544
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
7.7
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
4.9
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Forejtek J.Coppejans K.
Freshness·
—
76

Coppejans K.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 73 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Novak D.
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Tabur C.
6-46-0
Novak D.
Bonadio R.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Bonadio R.
Forejtek J.
6-46-3
Tabur C.
Moraing M.[7]
6-46-0
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Nagal S.
6-21-67-5
Novak D.
Dzumhur D.
6-16-3
R16
Bonadio R.
Shevchenko A.
7-54-67-5
Dzumhur D.
Andreev A.
6-46-2
Tabur C.
Hanfmann Y.[4]
6-42-66-3
Moraing M.[7]
Milojevic N.
6-756-26-2
Novak D.
Struff J.[3]
1-66-46-4
Forejtek J.
Coppejans K.
6-746-46-4
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Krutykh O.
6-16-2
Nagal S.
Arnaboldi A.
7-57-63
R32
Coppejans K.
Lopez Montagud C.
6-21-0
Andreev A.
Squire H.
6-26-4
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Rehberg M.
6-46-2
Krutykh O.
Topo M.
3-66-16-2
Bonadio R.
Agamenone F.[2]
6-11-66-3
Forejtek J.
Marterer M.[8]
6-37-64
Novak D.
Kopriva V.
6-746-27-5
Tabur C.
Klein L.
6-42-67-66
Hanfmann Y.[4]
Vatutin A.
6-26-2
Arnaboldi A.
Blancaneaux G.[6]
7-56-1
Milojevic N.
Horansky F.
6-26-1
Struff J.[3]
Molleker R.
7-56-0
Moraing M.[7]
Gerch L.
4-66-46-4
Nagal S.
Added D.
7-616-3
Shevchenko A.
Ferreira Silva F.
4-66-36-3
Dzumhur D.
Rodionov J.[5]
6-46-3