Sumit Nagal vs Dan Added — Meerbusch CH Round of 32

Meerbusch CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Sumit Nagal
IND
Sumit Nagal
#219ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 August 2022
clay
Dan Added
FRA
Dan Added
#237ATP
1418ELO
1285Clay ELO
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
Nagal S.
7-6 6-3
Added D.
Nagal S.
7762
Added D.
6130

Sumit Nagal defeated Dan Added 7-6 6-3 in the Meerbusch CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Sumit Nagal came in ranked #219, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Sumit Nagal closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Added D.

Added D.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Added D.
1st serve in·Clear edge
70%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
42%
38%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.4
4.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.8
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 161). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Added D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
33
21
Break points saved·Clear edge
69
81
Break points won·Dominant
35
9
Deciding sets·Clear edge
16
31
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
14

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nagal S.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Added D.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.2+252 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.8Clay Elo 1285
5.5Overall Elo 1543
ELO gap
4.5Overall Elo 1418
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
5.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.4
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Added D.
Freshness·Slight edge
92
100

Nagal S.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d) · Added D.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Novak D.
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Tabur C.
6-46-0
Novak D.
Bonadio R.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Bonadio R.
Forejtek J.
6-46-3
Tabur C.
Moraing M.[7]
6-46-0
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Nagal S.
6-21-67-5
Novak D.
Dzumhur D.
6-16-3
R16
Bonadio R.
Shevchenko A.
7-54-67-5
Dzumhur D.
Andreev A.
6-46-2
Tabur C.
Hanfmann Y.[4]
6-42-66-3
Moraing M.[7]
Milojevic N.
6-756-26-2
Novak D.
Struff J.[3]
1-66-46-4
Forejtek J.
Coppejans K.
6-746-46-4
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Krutykh O.
6-16-2
Nagal S.
Arnaboldi A.
7-57-63
R32
Coppejans K.
Lopez Montagud C.
6-21-0
Andreev A.
Squire H.
6-26-4
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Rehberg M.
6-46-2
Krutykh O.
Topo M.
3-66-16-2
Bonadio R.
Agamenone F.[2]
6-11-66-3
Forejtek J.
Marterer M.[8]
6-37-64
Novak D.
Kopriva V.
6-746-27-5
Tabur C.
Klein L.
6-42-67-66
Hanfmann Y.[4]
Vatutin A.
6-26-2
Arnaboldi A.
Blancaneaux G.[6]
7-56-1
Milojevic N.
Horansky F.
6-26-1
Struff J.[3]
Molleker R.
7-56-0
Moraing M.[7]
Gerch L.
4-66-46-4
Nagal S.
Added D.
7-616-3
Shevchenko A.
Ferreira Silva F.
4-66-36-3
Dzumhur D.
Rodionov J.[5]
6-46-3