Keegan Smith vs Li Tu — Lexington CH Round of 32

Lexington CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Keegan Smith
#204ATP
1421ELO
1395Hard ELO
28 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 August 2022
hard
AUS
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Smith K.
6-7 6-0 6-3
Tu L.
Smith K.
65662
Tu L.
77031

Keegan Smith defeated Li Tu 6-7 6-0 6-3 in the Lexington CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Keegan Smith dropped the opening set before beating Li Tu 6–7 6–0 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Smith K.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Tu L.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Smith K.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Smith K.Tu L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
71%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Even
6.6
6.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (157 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Smith K.Tu L.
Clutch Rating·Even
26
27
Break points saved·Even
84
82
Break points won·Slight edge
3
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
48
20
Tiebreaks·Dominant
10
64

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Smith K.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Tu L.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.9Hard Elo 1395
Surface ELO
7.1+77 Hard Elo edge
2.8Overall Elo 1421
ELO gap
7.2Overall Elo 1488
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
4.2
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
6.6
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Smith K.Tu L.
Freshness·
84
—

Smith K.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Shang J.
Gomez E.[2]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Shang J.
Kovacevic A.[7]
3-67-656-4
Gomez E.[2]
Couacaud E.[8]
4-66-47-65
Quarter-finals
Kovacevic A.[7]
Quiroz R.
4-66-36-4
Shang J.
Safiullin R.[1]
0-66-47-5
Couacaud E.[8]
Nanda G.
3-66-16-2
Gomez E.[2]
Mejia N.
6-47-5
R16
Gomez E.[2]
Harrison R.
7-56-4
Nanda G.
Holt B.
6-716-46-2
Quiroz R.
Brouwer G.[4]
6-46-4
Shang J.
Kukushkin M.[5]
7-656-3
Safiullin R.[1]
Mukund S.
6-37-63
Couacaud E.[8]
Smith K.
6-26-4
Mejia N.
Kirchheimer S.
7-623-66-3
Kovacevic A.[7]
Harris B.
7-651-66-4
R32
Holt B.
Seelig K.
6-47-65
Safiullin R.[1]
Ayeni O.
6-36-4
Harrison R.
Diez S.
7-646-2
Mejia N.
Habib H.
6-36-4
Kirchheimer S.
Olivieri G.[6]
6-16-1
Nanda G.
Svrcina D.[3]
7-686-1
Harris B.
Mchugh A.
6-33-66-3
Quiroz R.
Chung Y.
6-25-76-1
Kukushkin M.[5]
Hurrion M.
6-07-67
Smith K.
Tu L.
6-756-06-3
Couacaud E.[8]
Zhu E.
6-26-1
Gomez E.[2]
Kingsley C.
6-43-67-5
Shang J.
Dostanic S.
6-04-66-3
Brouwer G.[4]
Brymer G.
6-46-1
Kovacevic A.[7]
Svajda Z.
7-56-1
Mukund S.
Torpegaard M.
3-66-04-1