Juncheng Shang vs Mikhail Kukushkin — Lexington CH Round of 16

Lexington CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
CHN
Juncheng Shang
#274ATP
1746ELO
1698Hard ELO
21 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 August 2022
hard
Mikhail Kukushkin
KAZ5
Mikhail Kukushkin
#316ATP
1552ELO
1526Hard ELO
38 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLWL
Shang J.
7-6 6-3
Kukushkin M.
Shang J.
7762
Kukushkin M.
6530

Juncheng Shang defeated Mikhail Kukushkin 7-6 6-3 in the Lexington CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Shang J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Kukushkin M.

Kukushkin M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Shang J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Shang J.Kukushkin M.
34
Serve
—
18
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Shang J.Kukushkin M.
1st serve in·Even
64%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
53%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.7
2.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.7
1.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (197 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Shang J.Kukushkin M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
76
46
Break points saved·Even
96
93
Break points won·Even
45
41
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
41
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
44

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Shang J.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Kukushkin M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.0+173 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.0Hard Elo 1526
7.2Overall Elo 1746
ELO gap
2.8Overall Elo 1552
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
5.9
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Minutes 14d
8.0
4.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Shang J.
Gomez E.[2]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Shang J.
Kovacevic A.[7]
3-67-656-4
Gomez E.[2]
Couacaud E.[8]
4-66-47-65
Quarter-finals
Kovacevic A.[7]
Quiroz R.
4-66-36-4
Shang J.
Safiullin R.[1]
0-66-47-5
Couacaud E.[8]
Nanda G.
3-66-16-2
Gomez E.[2]
Mejia N.
6-47-5
R16
Gomez E.[2]
Harrison R.
7-56-4
Nanda G.
Holt B.
6-716-46-2
Quiroz R.
Brouwer G.[4]
6-46-4
Shang J.
Kukushkin M.[5]
7-656-3
Safiullin R.[1]
Mukund S.
6-37-63
Couacaud E.[8]
Smith K.
6-26-4
Mejia N.
Kirchheimer S.
7-623-66-3
Kovacevic A.[7]
Harris B.
7-651-66-4
R32
Holt B.
Seelig K.
6-47-65
Safiullin R.[1]
Ayeni O.
6-36-4
Harrison R.
Diez S.
7-646-2
Mejia N.
Habib H.
6-36-4
Kirchheimer S.
Olivieri G.[6]
6-16-1
Nanda G.
Svrcina D.[3]
7-686-1
Harris B.
Mchugh A.
6-33-66-3
Quiroz R.
Chung Y.
6-25-76-1
Kukushkin M.[5]
Hurrion M.
6-07-67
Smith K.
Tu L.
6-756-06-3
Couacaud E.[8]
Zhu E.
6-26-1
Gomez E.[2]
Kingsley C.
6-43-67-5
Shang J.
Dostanic S.
6-04-66-3
Brouwer G.[4]
Brymer G.
6-46-1
Kovacevic A.[7]
Svajda Z.
7-56-1
Mukund S.
Torpegaard M.
3-66-04-1