Brandon Holt vs Kyle Seelig — Lexington CH Round of 32

Lexington CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 August 2022
hard
USA
Kyle Seelig
#2142ATP
28 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLW
Holt B.
6-4 7-6
Seelig K.
Holt B.
6772
Seelig K.
4650

Brandon Holt defeated Kyle Seelig 6-4 7-6 in the Lexington CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Holt B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Seelig K.

Seelig K.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Serve advantage — Holt B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Holt B.Seelig K.
1st serve in·Even
66%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
58%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
53%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.9
1.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.0
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Holt B.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Seelig K.
3.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 98 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
3.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
4.8
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Shang J.
Gomez E.[2]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Shang J.
Kovacevic A.[7]
3-67-656-4
Gomez E.[2]
Couacaud E.[8]
4-66-47-65
Quarter-finals
Kovacevic A.[7]
Quiroz R.
4-66-36-4
Shang J.
Safiullin R.[1]
0-66-47-5
Couacaud E.[8]
Nanda G.
3-66-16-2
Gomez E.[2]
Mejia N.
6-47-5
R16
Gomez E.[2]
Harrison R.
7-56-4
Nanda G.
Holt B.
6-716-46-2
Quiroz R.
Brouwer G.[4]
6-46-4
Shang J.
Kukushkin M.[5]
7-656-3
Safiullin R.[1]
Mukund S.
6-37-63
Couacaud E.[8]
Smith K.
6-26-4
Mejia N.
Kirchheimer S.
7-623-66-3
Kovacevic A.[7]
Harris B.
7-651-66-4
R32
Holt B.
Seelig K.
6-47-65
Safiullin R.[1]
Ayeni O.
6-36-4
Harrison R.
Diez S.
7-646-2
Mejia N.
Habib H.
6-36-4
Kirchheimer S.
Olivieri G.[6]
6-16-1
Nanda G.
Svrcina D.[3]
7-686-1
Harris B.
Mchugh A.
6-33-66-3
Quiroz R.
Chung Y.
6-25-76-1
Kukushkin M.[5]
Hurrion M.
6-07-67
Smith K.
Tu L.
6-756-06-3
Couacaud E.[8]
Zhu E.
6-26-1
Gomez E.[2]
Kingsley C.
6-43-67-5
Shang J.
Dostanic S.
6-04-66-3
Brouwer G.[4]
Brymer G.
6-46-1
Kovacevic A.[7]
Svajda Z.
7-56-1
Mukund S.
Torpegaard M.
3-66-04-1