Emilio Gomez vs Cannon Kingsley — Lexington CH Round of 32

Lexington CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ECU2
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 August 2022
hard
USA
Cannon Kingsley
#429ATP
1342ELO
1345Hard ELO
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLWWLW
Gomez E.
6-4 3-6 7-5
Kingsley C.
Gomez E.
6372
Kingsley C.
4651

Emilio Gomez defeated Cannon Kingsley 6-4 3-6 7-5 in the Lexington CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Emilio Gomez came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Emilio Gomez closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gomez E.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Kingsley C.

Kingsley C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Serve advantage — Kingsley C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gomez E.Kingsley C.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
52%
Service points won·Even
60%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.4
6.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (126 vs 110). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gomez E.Kingsley C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
32
21
Break points saved·Even
77
74
Break points won·Even
19
19
Deciding sets·Even
23
27
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
20

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gomez E.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kingsley C.
3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 315 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
9.4
Surface form
3.1
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.5
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Shang J.
Gomez E.[2]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Shang J.
Kovacevic A.[7]
3-67-656-4
Gomez E.[2]
Couacaud E.[8]
4-66-47-65
Quarter-finals
Kovacevic A.[7]
Quiroz R.
4-66-36-4
Shang J.
Safiullin R.[1]
0-66-47-5
Couacaud E.[8]
Nanda G.
3-66-16-2
Gomez E.[2]
Mejia N.
6-47-5
R16
Gomez E.[2]
Harrison R.
7-56-4
Nanda G.
Holt B.
6-716-46-2
Quiroz R.
Brouwer G.[4]
6-46-4
Shang J.
Kukushkin M.[5]
7-656-3
Safiullin R.[1]
Mukund S.
6-37-63
Couacaud E.[8]
Smith K.
6-26-4
Mejia N.
Kirchheimer S.
7-623-66-3
Kovacevic A.[7]
Harris B.
7-651-66-4
R32
Holt B.
Seelig K.
6-47-65
Safiullin R.[1]
Ayeni O.
6-36-4
Harrison R.
Diez S.
7-646-2
Mejia N.
Habib H.
6-36-4
Kirchheimer S.
Olivieri G.[6]
6-16-1
Nanda G.
Svrcina D.[3]
7-686-1
Harris B.
Mchugh A.
6-33-66-3
Quiroz R.
Chung Y.
6-25-76-1
Kukushkin M.[5]
Hurrion M.
6-07-67
Smith K.
Tu L.
6-756-06-3
Couacaud E.[8]
Zhu E.
6-26-1
Gomez E.[2]
Kingsley C.
6-43-67-5
Shang J.
Dostanic S.
6-04-66-3
Brouwer G.[4]
Brymer G.
6-46-1
Kovacevic A.[7]
Svajda Z.
7-56-1
Mukund S.
Torpegaard M.
3-66-04-1