Emilio Gomez vs Ryan Harrison — Lexington CH Round of 16

Lexington CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ECU2
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 August 2022
hard
USA
Ryan Harrison
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLLLW
Gomez E.
7-5 6-4
Harrison R.
Gomez E.
762
Harrison R.
540

Emilio Gomez defeated Ryan Harrison 7-5 6-4 in the Lexington CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Emilio Gomez came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gomez E.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Harrison R.

Harrison R.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gomez E.Harrison R.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
52%
Service points won·Even
60%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.4
5.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.5
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (126 vs 34). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gomez E.Harrison R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
32
46
Break points saved·Clear edge
77
93
Break points won·Even
19
16
Deciding sets·Dominant
23
65
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
41

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gomez E.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Harrison R.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
9.4
Surface form
3.3
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
5.5
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Shang J.
Gomez E.[2]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Shang J.
Kovacevic A.[7]
3-67-656-4
Gomez E.[2]
Couacaud E.[8]
4-66-47-65
Quarter-finals
Kovacevic A.[7]
Quiroz R.
4-66-36-4
Shang J.
Safiullin R.[1]
0-66-47-5
Couacaud E.[8]
Nanda G.
3-66-16-2
Gomez E.[2]
Mejia N.
6-47-5
R16
Gomez E.[2]
Harrison R.
7-56-4
Nanda G.
Holt B.
6-716-46-2
Quiroz R.
Brouwer G.[4]
6-46-4
Shang J.
Kukushkin M.[5]
7-656-3
Safiullin R.[1]
Mukund S.
6-37-63
Couacaud E.[8]
Smith K.
6-26-4
Mejia N.
Kirchheimer S.
7-623-66-3
Kovacevic A.[7]
Harris B.
7-651-66-4
R32
Holt B.
Seelig K.
6-47-65
Safiullin R.[1]
Ayeni O.
6-36-4
Harrison R.
Diez S.
7-646-2
Mejia N.
Habib H.
6-36-4
Kirchheimer S.
Olivieri G.[6]
6-16-1
Nanda G.
Svrcina D.[3]
7-686-1
Harris B.
Mchugh A.
6-33-66-3
Quiroz R.
Chung Y.
6-25-76-1
Kukushkin M.[5]
Hurrion M.
6-07-67
Smith K.
Tu L.
6-756-06-3
Couacaud E.[8]
Zhu E.
6-26-1
Gomez E.[2]
Kingsley C.
6-43-67-5
Shang J.
Dostanic S.
6-04-66-3
Brouwer G.[4]
Brymer G.
6-46-1
Kovacevic A.[7]
Svajda Z.
7-56-1
Mukund S.
Torpegaard M.
3-66-04-1