Juncheng Shang vs Stefan Dostanic — Lexington CH Round of 32

Lexington CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
CHN
Juncheng Shang
#274ATP
1746ELO
1698Hard ELO
21 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 August 2022
hard
USA
Stefan Dostanic
#276ATP
1485ELO
1492Hard ELO
24 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLL
Shang J.
6-0 4-6 6-3
Dostanic S.
Shang J.
6462
Dostanic S.
0631

Juncheng Shang defeated Stefan Dostanic 6-0 4-6 6-3 in the Lexington CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Shang J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Dostanic S.

Dostanic S.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Shang J.

Serve advantage — Dostanic S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Shang J.Dostanic S.
34
Serve
—
18
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Shang J.Dostanic S.
1st serve in·Even
64%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.7
5.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (197 vs 87). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Shang J.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Dostanic S.
3.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 371 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
7.2+207 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.8Hard Elo 1492
7.4Overall Elo 1746
ELO gap
2.6Overall Elo 1485
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Shang J.
Gomez E.[2]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Shang J.
Kovacevic A.[7]
3-67-656-4
Gomez E.[2]
Couacaud E.[8]
4-66-47-65
Quarter-finals
Kovacevic A.[7]
Quiroz R.
4-66-36-4
Shang J.
Safiullin R.[1]
0-66-47-5
Couacaud E.[8]
Nanda G.
3-66-16-2
Gomez E.[2]
Mejia N.
6-47-5
R16
Gomez E.[2]
Harrison R.
7-56-4
Nanda G.
Holt B.
6-716-46-2
Quiroz R.
Brouwer G.[4]
6-46-4
Shang J.
Kukushkin M.[5]
7-656-3
Safiullin R.[1]
Mukund S.
6-37-63
Couacaud E.[8]
Smith K.
6-26-4
Mejia N.
Kirchheimer S.
7-623-66-3
Kovacevic A.[7]
Harris B.
7-651-66-4
R32
Holt B.
Seelig K.
6-47-65
Safiullin R.[1]
Ayeni O.
6-36-4
Harrison R.
Diez S.
7-646-2
Mejia N.
Habib H.
6-36-4
Kirchheimer S.
Olivieri G.[6]
6-16-1
Nanda G.
Svrcina D.[3]
7-686-1
Harris B.
Mchugh A.
6-33-66-3
Quiroz R.
Chung Y.
6-25-76-1
Kukushkin M.[5]
Hurrion M.
6-07-67
Smith K.
Tu L.
6-756-06-3
Couacaud E.[8]
Zhu E.
6-26-1
Gomez E.[2]
Kingsley C.
6-43-67-5
Shang J.
Dostanic S.
6-04-66-3
Brouwer G.[4]
Brymer G.
6-46-1
Kovacevic A.[7]
Svajda Z.
7-56-1
Mukund S.
Torpegaard M.
3-66-04-1