Emma Raducanu vs Louisa Chirico — Washington Round of 32

Washington · WTA · Round of 32
Emma Raducanu
GBR2
Emma Raducanu
#33WTA
1834ELO
1773Hard ELO
$605kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
23 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 August 2022
hard
Louisa Chirico
USA
Louisa Chirico
#320WTA
1476ELO
1411Hard ELO
30 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Raducanu E.
6-4 6-2
Chirico L.
Raducanu E.
662
Chirico L.
420

Emma Raducanu defeated Louisa Chirico 6-4 6-2 in the Washington round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Emma Raducanu came in ranked #33.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Raducanu E.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Chirico L.

Chirico L.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Raducanu E.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Raducanu E.Chirico L.
32
Serve
—
54
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Raducanu E.Chirico L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
44%
Service points won·Even
57%
55%
Return points won·Even
45%
44%
Break points saved·Even
58%
54%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.2
5.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (139 vs 125). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Raducanu E.Chirico L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
64
28
Break points saved·Dominant
96
46
Break points won·Dominant
99
74
Deciding sets·Slight edge
29
19
Tiebreaks·Even
83
83

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Raducanu E.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Chirico L.
3.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
9.5+362 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.5Hard Elo 1411
9.4Overall Elo 1834
ELO gap
0.6Overall Elo 1476
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.0
Surface form
1.9
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Country comfort
6.0
7.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
26°COvercast
Wind 12 km/hHumidity 65%

Draw

Final
Samsonova L.
Kanepi K.[6]
4-66-36-3
Semi-finals
Kanepi K.[6]
Saville D.
6-36-1
Samsonova L.
Wang X.
6-16-1
Quarter-finals
Kanepi K.[6]
Kalinskaya A.
6-746-46-3
Wang X.
Azarenka V.[4]
6-16-3
Samsonova L.
Raducanu E.[2]
7-666-1
Saville D.
Marino R.
6-17-5
R16
Raducanu E.[2]
Osorio C.
7-657-64
Kalinskaya A.
Halep S.[3]
7-52-0
Marino R.
Petkovic A.
6-33-66-1
Wang X.
Vekic D.
4-67-56-1
Saville D.
Pegula J.[1]
7-56-4
Kanepi K.[6]
Zhu L.
4-66-46-4
Samsonova L.
Tomljanovic A.
4-66-36-2
Azarenka V.[4]
Martincova T.
7-676-2
R32
Pegula J.[1]
Baptiste H.
6-26-2
Saville D.
Bjorklund M.
3-67-57-64
Marino R.
Williams V.
4-66-16-4
Petkovic A.
Tauson C.[8]
6-26-2
Halep S.[3]
Bucsa C.
6-37-5
Kanepi K.[6]
Minnen G.
6-36-3
Wang X.
Maria T.
6-27-5
Azarenka V.[4]
Yastremska D.
6-46-0
Kalinskaya A.
Brengle M.
6-36-0
Martincova T.
Wang X.
0-66-46-4
Zhu L.
Dart H.
6-46-3
Vekic D.
Sherif M.[7]
6-46-1
Samsonova L.
Mertens E.[5]
7-646-4
Tomljanovic A.
Stephens S.
6-16-4
Osorio C.
Kenin S.
7-626-1
Raducanu E.[2]
Chirico L.
6-46-2