Qiang Wang vs Rebecca Peterson — Prague Round of 32

Prague · WTA · Round of 32
CHN
Qiang Wang
34 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 July 2022
clay
SWE
Rebecca Peterson
30 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWWLL
Wang Q.
1-6 6-3 7-6
Peterson R.
Wang Q.
16772
Peterson R.
63641

Qiang Wang defeated Rebecca Peterson 1-6 6-3 7-6 in the Prague round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wang Q.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Peterson R.

Peterson R.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Wang Q.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Wang Q.Peterson R.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
44%
Service points won·Even
56%
57%
Return points won·Even
44%
44%
Break points saved·Even
53%
53%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.9
2.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.0
4.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (54 vs 77). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wang Q.Peterson R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
27
40
Break points saved·Slight edge
46
36
Break points won·Even
74
76
Deciding sets·Clear edge
46
60
Tiebreaks·Dominant
22
67

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wang Q.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Peterson R.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
3.6
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.3
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
3.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
30°CClear
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 34%

Draw

Final
Bouzkova M.[8]
Potapova A.[7]
6-06-3
Semi-finals
Potapova A.[7]
Wang Q.
6-36-0
Bouzkova M.[8]
Noskova L.
7-646-3
Quarter-finals
Potapova A.[7]
Kontaveit A.[1]
6-16-1
Bouzkova M.[8]
Selekhmeteva O.
6-36-0
Noskova L.
Hibino N.
6-34-2
Wang Q.
Linette M.
7-56-756-4
R16
Potapova A.[7]
Zhu L.
6-47-68
Bouzkova M.[8]
Salkova D.
6-16-2
Selekhmeteva O.
Paquet C.
6-41-66-3
Noskova L.
Cornet A.[5]
7-51-67-67
Linette M.
Tomova V.
6-36-3
Kontaveit A.[1]
Havlickova L.
6-46-3
Hibino N.
Krejcikova B.[2]
3-67-656-3
Wang Q.
Jakupovic D.
6-36-1
R32
Havlickova L.
Palicova B.
6-27-65
Zhu L.
Diatchenko V.
6-16-1
Potapova A.[7]
Wang X.
6-16-2
Linette M.
Mertens E.[3]
6-32-66-2
Jakupovic D.
Van Uytvanck A.[6]
5-2
Wang Q.
Peterson R.
1-66-37-64
Cornet A.[5]
Zakharova A.
6-26-3
Hibino N.
Buzarnescu M.
6-26-2
Kontaveit A.[1]
Gorgodze E.
6-06-1
Krejcikova B.[2]
Blinkova A.
6-36-1
Noskova L.
Vikhlyantseva N.
6-23-1
Tomova V.
Snigur D.
6-46-2
Salkova D.
In Albon Y.
6-16-4
Paquet C.
Martincova T.
2-66-46-3
Bouzkova M.[8]
Kraus S.
6-27-62
Selekhmeteva O.
Cirstea S.[4]
7-56-4