Giulio Zeppieri vs Bernabe Zapata Miralles — Umag Quarter-final

Umag · ATP · Quarter-final
Giulio Zeppieri
ITA
Giulio Zeppieri
#193ATP
1622ELO
1566Clay ELO
$70kYTD
$1.4MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 July 2022
clay
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
ESP
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
1413ELO
1407Clay ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Zeppieri G.
7-5 6-4
Zapata Miralles B.
Zeppieri G.
762
Zapata Miralles B.
540

Giulio Zeppieri defeated Bernabe Zapata Miralles 7-5 6-4 in the Umag quarter-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zeppieri G.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Zapata Miralles B.

Zapata Miralles B.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Zeppieri G.

Serve advantage — Zeppieri G.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zeppieri G.Zapata Miralles B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
62%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
57%
Return points won·Even
37%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.8
1.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zeppieri G.Zapata Miralles B.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
55
49
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
74
Break points won·Dominant
39
80
Deciding sets·Slight edge
68
57
Tiebreaks·Dominant
44
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zeppieri G.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Zapata Miralles B.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.9+158 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.1Clay Elo 1407
7.6Overall Elo 1622
ELO gap
2.4Overall Elo 1413
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
5.2
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
2.3
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Sinner J.[2]
Alcaraz C.[1]
6-756-16-1
Semi-finals
Alcaraz C.[1]
Zeppieri G.
7-54-66-3
Sinner J.[2]
Agamenone F.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Agamenone F.
Cecchinato M.[4]
6-26-1
Alcaraz C.[1]
Bagnis F.
6-06-4
Sinner J.[2]
Carballes Baena R.
6-47-65
Zeppieri G.
Zapata Miralles B.
7-56-4
R16
Cecchinato M.[4]
Musetti L.[8]
6-46-3
Zeppieri G.
Galan D.
6-43-66-1
Sinner J.[2]
Munar J.
6-46-4
Alcaraz C.[1]
Gombos N.
6-26-3
Bagnis F.
Moutet C.
6-36-1
Zapata Miralles B.
Rune H.[3]
3-66-36-2
Agamenone F.
Baez S.[4]
3-66-17-5
Carballes Baena R.
Molcan A.[5]
3-66-26-3
R32
Cecchinato M.[4]
Poljicak M.
6-15-76-2
Bagnis F.
Etcheverry T.[3]
7-56-3
Molcan A.[5]
Ajdukovic D.
6-27-62
Gombos N.
Delbonis F.
6-45-76-4
Zeppieri G.
Cachin P.
3-66-16-4
Carballes Baena R.
Laaksonen H.
6-47-5
Munar J.
Ymer M.
4-66-16-4
Zapata Miralles B.
Prizmic D.
6-43-0
Moutet C.
Altmaier D.[6]
6-46-2
Agamenone F.
Djere L.
7-682-67-5
Musetti L.[8]
Bedene A.
6-23-66-1
Galan D.
Fognini F.[7]
6-35-76-3