Qiang Wang vs Dalila Jakupovic — Prague Round of 16

Prague · WTA · Round of 16
CHN
Qiang Wang
34 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 July 2022
clay
SLO
Dalila Jakupovic
#358WTA
1388ELO
1353Clay ELO
35 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWL
Wang Q.
6-3 6-1
Jakupovic D.
Wang Q.
662
Jakupovic D.
310

Qiang Wang defeated Dalila Jakupovic 6-3 6-1 in the Prague round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wang Q.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Jakupovic D.

Jakupovic D.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Wang Q.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Wang Q.Jakupovic D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
62%
56%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
45%
Service points won·Even
56%
53%
Return points won·Even
43%
44%
Break points saved·Even
54%
51%
Aces / match·Even
1.9
1.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (54 vs 117). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wang Q.Jakupovic D.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
27
16
Break points saved·Dominant
46
5
Break points won·Even
74
71
Deciding sets·Slight edge
46
39
Tiebreaks·Dominant
22
75

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wang Q.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Jakupovic D.
3.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 1043 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
2.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Prev. match
3.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
30°CClear
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 34%

Draw

Final
Bouzkova M.[8]
Potapova A.[7]
6-06-3
Semi-finals
Potapova A.[7]
Wang Q.
6-36-0
Bouzkova M.[8]
Noskova L.
7-646-3
Quarter-finals
Potapova A.[7]
Kontaveit A.[1]
6-16-1
Bouzkova M.[8]
Selekhmeteva O.
6-36-0
Noskova L.
Hibino N.
6-34-2
Wang Q.
Linette M.
7-56-756-4
R16
Potapova A.[7]
Zhu L.
6-47-68
Bouzkova M.[8]
Salkova D.
6-16-2
Selekhmeteva O.
Paquet C.
6-41-66-3
Noskova L.
Cornet A.[5]
7-51-67-67
Linette M.
Tomova V.
6-36-3
Kontaveit A.[1]
Havlickova L.
6-46-3
Hibino N.
Krejcikova B.[2]
3-67-656-3
Wang Q.
Jakupovic D.
6-36-1
R32
Havlickova L.
Palicova B.
6-27-65
Zhu L.
Diatchenko V.
6-16-1
Potapova A.[7]
Wang X.
6-16-2
Linette M.
Mertens E.[3]
6-32-66-2
Jakupovic D.
Van Uytvanck A.[6]
5-2
Wang Q.
Peterson R.
1-66-37-64
Cornet A.[5]
Zakharova A.
6-26-3
Hibino N.
Buzarnescu M.
6-26-2
Kontaveit A.[1]
Gorgodze E.
6-06-1
Krejcikova B.[2]
Blinkova A.
6-36-1
Noskova L.
Vikhlyantseva N.
6-23-1
Tomova V.
Snigur D.
6-46-2
Salkova D.
In Albon Y.
6-16-4
Paquet C.
Martincova T.
2-66-46-3
Bouzkova M.[8]
Kraus S.
6-27-62
Selekhmeteva O.
Cirstea S.[4]
7-56-4