Tung Lin Wu vs Brandon Holt — Winnipeg CH Round of 32

Winnipeg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Tung Lin Wu
TPE6
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 July 2022
hard
USA
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Wu T.
6-2 6-7 6-3
Holt B.
Wu T.
66362
Holt B.
27731

Tung Lin Wu defeated Brandon Holt 6-2 6-7 6-3 in the Winnipeg CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tung Lin Wu came in ranked #329, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Tung Lin Wu extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Tung Lin Wu closed it out in three sets, 6–2 6–7 6–3.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-02-13Delray BeachQ1hardTung Lin Wu6-4 3-6 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Wu T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Holt B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Wu T.Holt B.
1st serve in·Even
68%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.8
4.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
1.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wu T.Holt B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
10
58
Break points saved·Even
84
85
Break points won·Dominant
6
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
6
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wu T.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Holt B.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.7Hard Elo 1376
Surface ELO
6.3+131 Hard Elo edge
3.7Overall Elo 1406
ELO gap
6.3Overall Elo 1537
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
6.8
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
4.4
7.0
3-set count
0.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wu T.Holt B.
Freshness·
80
—

Wu T.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Gomez E.[2]
Galarneau A.
6-37-64
Semi-finals
Galarneau A.
Zhu E.
6-37-5
Gomez E.[2]
Couacaud E.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Gomez E.[2]
Olivieri G.[8]
6-46-1
Galarneau A.
Broady L.[1]
7-656-716-3
Couacaud E.
Tu L.
6-46-3
Zhu E.
Ayeni O.
4-66-36-4
R16
Ayeni O.
Edmund K.
7-666-2
Gomez E.[2]
Mejia N.
6-36-1
Couacaud E.
Mchugh A.
6-23-66-4
Tu L.
Brouwer G.[7]
6-46-2
Galarneau A.
Wu T.[6]
6-37-65
Broady L.[1]
Nanda G.
6-36-3
Zhu E.
Uchida K.[5]
6-45-76-4
Olivieri G.[8]
Rybakov A.
6-46-4
R32
Uchida K.[5]
Quiroz R.
6-16-736-3
Brouwer G.[7]
Aguilar J.
6-26-3
Mejia N.
Hsu Y.
6-22-67-64
Rybakov A.
Uchiyama Y.
7-56-3
Olivieri G.[8]
Mochizuki S.
4-66-46-0
Tu L.
Diallo G.
6-17-5
Zhu E.
Draxl L.
2-67-56-1
Edmund K.
Hijikata R.
6-36-4
Ayeni O.
Mmoh M.[4]
6-46-4
Wu T.[6]
Holt B.
6-26-736-3
Galarneau A.
Blanch U.
4-67-666-2
Gomez E.[2]
Harris B.
6-36-4
Mchugh A.
Shimabukuro S.
6-34-66-1
Nanda G.
Svajda Z.
3-66-26-3
Couacaud E.
Pospisil V.[3]
6-746-34-0