Nao Hibino vs Barbora Krejcikova — Prague Round of 16

Prague · WTA · Round of 16
Nao Hibino
JPN
Nao Hibino
#246WTA
1560ELO
1487Clay ELO
31 yrs · 163 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 July 2022
clay
Barbora Krejcikova
CZE2
Barbora Krejcikova
#38WTA
1874ELO
1718Clay ELO
$650kYTD
$19MCAREER
30 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWWWL
Hibino N.
3-6 7-6 6-3
Krejcikova B.
Hibino N.
37762
Krejcikova B.
66531

Nao Hibino defeated Barbora Krejcikova 3-6 7-6 6-3 in the Prague round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Barbora Krejcikova came in ranked #38, defending the title.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hibino N.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Krejcikova B.

Krejcikova B.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Hibino N.

Serve advantage — Krejcikova B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hibino N.Krejcikova B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
61%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
46%
Service points won·Even
56%
60%
Return points won·Even
44%
44%
Break points saved·Even
54%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.9
3.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.6
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 159). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hibino N.Krejcikova B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
52
92
Break points saved·Dominant
39
93
Break points won·Even
91
92
Deciding sets·Dominant
66
98
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
81
89

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hibino N.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Krejcikova B.
7.8
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.7Clay Elo 1487
Surface ELO
7.3+231 Clay Elo edge
1.0Overall Elo 1560
ELO gap
9.0Overall Elo 1874
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.7
Surface form
6.5
0.0Lost last 6
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.7
Minutes 14d
6.5
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Country comfort
8.7
Context
5.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Hibino N.Krejcikova B.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
82

Hibino N.: 18 days rest · Krejcikova B.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 33 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
30°CClear
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 34%

Draw

Final
Bouzkova M.[8]
Potapova A.[7]
6-06-3
Semi-finals
Potapova A.[7]
Wang Q.
6-36-0
Bouzkova M.[8]
Noskova L.
7-646-3
Quarter-finals
Potapova A.[7]
Kontaveit A.[1]
6-16-1
Bouzkova M.[8]
Selekhmeteva O.
6-36-0
Noskova L.
Hibino N.
6-34-2
Wang Q.
Linette M.
7-56-756-4
R16
Potapova A.[7]
Zhu L.
6-47-68
Bouzkova M.[8]
Salkova D.
6-16-2
Selekhmeteva O.
Paquet C.
6-41-66-3
Noskova L.
Cornet A.[5]
7-51-67-67
Linette M.
Tomova V.
6-36-3
Kontaveit A.[1]
Havlickova L.
6-46-3
Hibino N.
Krejcikova B.[2]
3-67-656-3
Wang Q.
Jakupovic D.
6-36-1
R32
Havlickova L.
Palicova B.
6-27-65
Zhu L.
Diatchenko V.
6-16-1
Potapova A.[7]
Wang X.
6-16-2
Linette M.
Mertens E.[3]
6-32-66-2
Jakupovic D.
Van Uytvanck A.[6]
5-2
Wang Q.
Peterson R.
1-66-37-64
Cornet A.[5]
Zakharova A.
6-26-3
Hibino N.
Buzarnescu M.
6-26-2
Kontaveit A.[1]
Gorgodze E.
6-06-1
Krejcikova B.[2]
Blinkova A.
6-36-1
Noskova L.
Vikhlyantseva N.
6-23-1
Tomova V.
Snigur D.
6-46-2
Salkova D.
In Albon Y.
6-16-4
Paquet C.
Martincova T.
2-66-46-3
Bouzkova M.[8]
Kraus S.
6-27-62
Selekhmeteva O.
Cirstea S.[4]
7-56-4