Michael Geerts vs Emilio Nava — El Espinar CH Quarter-final

El Espinar CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Michael Geerts
BEL
Michael Geerts
#328ATP
1400ELO
1383Hard ELO
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 July 2022
hard
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
Geerts M.
6-4 6-4
Nava E.
Geerts M.
662
Nava E.
440

Michael Geerts defeated Emilio Nava 6-4 6-4 in the El Espinar CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #91.

Key context

  • Match story: Michael Geerts edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Geerts M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Nava E.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Geerts M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Geerts M.Nava E.
—
Serve
39
—
Return
21

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Geerts M.Nava E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.3
7.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Geerts M.Nava E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
9
52
Break points saved·Clear edge
82
94
Break points won·Clear edge
3
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
8
89
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
2
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Geerts M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Nava E.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.1Hard Elo 1383
Surface ELO
7.9+238 Hard Elo edge
1.4Overall Elo 1400
ELO gap
8.6Overall Elo 1704
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
4.8
Surface form
5.3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
6.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Geerts M.Nava E.
Freshness·Slight edge
89
100

Geerts M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d) · Nava E.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Grenier H.[4]
Lestienne C.[2]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Lestienne C.[2]
Geerts M.
2-67-57-64
Grenier H.[4]
Humbert U.[5]
6-757-56-2
Quarter-finals
Humbert U.[5]
Borges N.[1]
7-666-4
Grenier H.[4]
Barrere G.[8]
6-26-2
Lestienne C.[2]
Lock B.
7-684-66-3
Geerts M.
Nava E.
6-46-4
R16
Lock B.
Marchenko I.
7-662-66-3
Humbert U.[5]
Masur D.
6-36-3
Nava E.
Verdasco F.[3]
7-687-5
Geerts M.
Yevseyev D.
6-46-3
Barrere G.[8]
Bellier A.
6-46-4
Grenier H.[4]
Kuhn N.
6-46-4
Borges N.[1]
Kachmazov A.
6-16-2
Lestienne C.[2]
Escoffier A.
6-36-3
R32
Lock B.
Celikbilek A.[6]
6-06-2
Verdasco F.[3]
Moriya H.
6-46-2
Geerts M.
Popko D.[7]
6-46-4
Barrere G.[8]
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-3
Kuhn N.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-26-4
Kachmazov A.
Istomin D.
0-66-47-64
Nava E.
Jubb P.
7-656-2
Marchenko I.
Kuznetsov A.
6-746-16-3
Bellier A.
Alvarez Varona N.
5-77-56-1
Masur D.
Donskoy E.
6-46-4
Yevseyev D.
Rincon D.
6-25-76-3
Grenier H.[4]
Moro Canas A.
6-46-3
Borges N.[1]
Basic M.
6-36-3
Humbert U.[5]
Decamps G.
6-36-4
Escoffier A.
Porras J.
6-26-3
Lestienne C.[2]
Barroso Campos A.
4-66-26-4