Enzo Couacaud vs Vasek Pospisil — Winnipeg CH Round of 32

Winnipeg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA
Enzo Couacaud
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLLWWL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 25 July 2022
hard
CAN3
Vasek Pospisil
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
Couacaud E.
6-7 6-3 4-0
Pospisil V.
Couacaud E.
6464–
Pospisil V.
7730–

Enzo Couacaud advanced when Vasek Pospisil retired 6-7 6-3 4-0 in the Winnipeg CH round of 32.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Couacaud E.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Pospisil V.

Pospisil V.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Couacaud E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Couacaud E.Pospisil V.
1st serve in·Even
56%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
78%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.6
9.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (184 vs 111). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Couacaud E.Pospisil V.
Clutch Rating·Even
47
49
Break points saved·Clear edge
79
96
Break points won·Clear edge
29
7
Deciding sets·Clear edge
77
62
Tiebreaks·Dominant
29
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Couacaud E.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Pospisil V.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.3
Surface form
5.2
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.5
Minutes 14d
7.8
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Gomez E.[2]
Galarneau A.
6-37-64
Semi-finals
Galarneau A.
Zhu E.
6-37-5
Gomez E.[2]
Couacaud E.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Gomez E.[2]
Olivieri G.[8]
6-46-1
Galarneau A.
Broady L.[1]
7-656-716-3
Couacaud E.
Tu L.
6-46-3
Zhu E.
Ayeni O.
4-66-36-4
R16
Ayeni O.
Edmund K.
7-666-2
Gomez E.[2]
Mejia N.
6-36-1
Couacaud E.
Mchugh A.
6-23-66-4
Tu L.
Brouwer G.[7]
6-46-2
Galarneau A.
Wu T.[6]
6-37-65
Broady L.[1]
Nanda G.
6-36-3
Zhu E.
Uchida K.[5]
6-45-76-4
Olivieri G.[8]
Rybakov A.
6-46-4
R32
Uchida K.[5]
Quiroz R.
6-16-736-3
Brouwer G.[7]
Aguilar J.
6-26-3
Mejia N.
Hsu Y.
6-22-67-64
Rybakov A.
Uchiyama Y.
7-56-3
Olivieri G.[8]
Mochizuki S.
4-66-46-0
Tu L.
Diallo G.
6-17-5
Zhu E.
Draxl L.
2-67-56-1
Edmund K.
Hijikata R.
6-36-4
Ayeni O.
Mmoh M.[4]
6-46-4
Wu T.[6]
Holt B.
6-26-736-3
Galarneau A.
Blanch U.
4-67-666-2
Gomez E.[2]
Harris B.
6-36-4
Mchugh A.
Shimabukuro S.
6-34-66-1
Nanda G.
Svajda Z.
3-66-26-3
Couacaud E.
Pospisil V.[3]
6-746-34-0