Benjamin Lock vs Altug Celikbilek — El Espinar CH Round of 32

El Espinar CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ZIM
Benjamin Lock
33 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 July 2022
hard
TUR6
Altug Celikbilek
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
Lock B.
6-0 6-2
Celikbilek A.
Lock B.
662
Celikbilek A.
020

Benjamin Lock defeated Altug Celikbilek 6-0 6-2 in the El Espinar CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Benjamin Lock came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Benjamin Lock extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-02-03Davis Cup G2 R1: TUR vs ZIMRRhardBenjamin Lock6-4 1-6 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Lock B.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Celikbilek A.

Celikbilek A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Lock B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lock B.Celikbilek A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.7
6.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.9
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (109 vs 124). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lock B.Celikbilek A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
0
40
Break points saved·Dominant
46
73
Break points won·Dominant
0
38
Deciding sets·Dominant
3
57
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
45
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Lock B.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Celikbilek A.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
7.8
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.9
Minutes 14d
9.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Grenier H.[4]
Lestienne C.[2]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Lestienne C.[2]
Geerts M.
2-67-57-64
Grenier H.[4]
Humbert U.[5]
6-757-56-2
Quarter-finals
Humbert U.[5]
Borges N.[1]
7-666-4
Grenier H.[4]
Barrere G.[8]
6-26-2
Lestienne C.[2]
Lock B.
7-684-66-3
Geerts M.
Nava E.
6-46-4
R16
Lock B.
Marchenko I.
7-662-66-3
Humbert U.[5]
Masur D.
6-36-3
Nava E.
Verdasco F.[3]
7-687-5
Geerts M.
Yevseyev D.
6-46-3
Barrere G.[8]
Bellier A.
6-46-4
Grenier H.[4]
Kuhn N.
6-46-4
Borges N.[1]
Kachmazov A.
6-16-2
Lestienne C.[2]
Escoffier A.
6-36-3
R32
Lock B.
Celikbilek A.[6]
6-06-2
Verdasco F.[3]
Moriya H.
6-46-2
Geerts M.
Popko D.[7]
6-46-4
Barrere G.[8]
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-3
Kuhn N.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-26-4
Kachmazov A.
Istomin D.
0-66-47-64
Nava E.
Jubb P.
7-656-2
Marchenko I.
Kuznetsov A.
6-746-16-3
Bellier A.
Alvarez Varona N.
5-77-56-1
Masur D.
Donskoy E.
6-46-4
Yevseyev D.
Rincon D.
6-25-76-3
Grenier H.[4]
Moro Canas A.
6-46-3
Borges N.[1]
Basic M.
6-36-3
Humbert U.[5]
Decamps G.
6-36-4
Escoffier A.
Porras J.
6-26-3
Lestienne C.[2]
Barroso Campos A.
4-66-26-4