Ben Shelton vs Tim Van Rijthoven — Indianapolis CH Round of 16

Indianapolis CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Ben Shelton
USA
Ben Shelton
#6ATP
1960ELO
1922Hard ELO
$2.2MYTD
$14MCAREER
23 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWLW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 18 July 2022
hard
NED2
Tim Van Rijthoven
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Shelton B.
6-7 1-2
Van Rijthoven T.
Shelton B.
671–
Van Rijthoven T.
792–

Ben Shelton advanced when Tim Van Rijthoven retired 6-7 1-2 in the Indianapolis CH round of 16.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Shelton B.serving94% hold

wins 74% of points on serve vs Van Rijthoven T.

Van Rijthoven T.serving94% hold

wins 74% of points on serve vs Shelton B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Shelton B.Van Rijthoven T.
76
Serve
—
18
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Shelton B.Van Rijthoven T.
1st serve in·Even
66%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
53%
Service points won·Even
68%
68%
Return points won·Even
33%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
70%
65%
Aces / match·Slight edge
9.8
11.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 71). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Shelton B.Van Rijthoven T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
85
26
Break points saved·Slight edge
100
90
Break points won·Dominant
58
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
19
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
61

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Shelton B.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Van Rijthoven T.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.4
Surface form
5.4
9.06-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3.5
Minutes 14d
8.5
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
6.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Shelton B.Van Rijthoven T.
Freshness·
95
—

Shelton B.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Wu Y.
Kovacevic A.
6-7107-6136-3
Semi-finals
Kovacevic A.
Shelton B.
6-47-5
Wu Y.
Uchiyama Y.
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Wu Y.
Rybakov A.
6-36-3
Kovacevic A.
Koepfer D.[5]
7-57-65
Uchiyama Y.
Eubanks C.[8]
7-636-746-4
Shelton B.
Purcell M.
7-656-4
R16
Purcell M.
Mchugh A.
6-756-36-4
Kovacevic A.
Shimabukuro S.
6-36-4
Eubanks C.[8]
Shang J.
7-56-3
Rybakov A.
Galarneau A.
6-45-76-3
Wu Y.
Gojowczyk P.[1]
6-46-2
Koepfer D.[5]
Tu L.
6-26-3
Uchiyama Y.
Harris B.
6-47-67
Shelton B.
Van Rijthoven T.[2]
6-771-2
R32
Gojowczyk P.[1]
Basavareddy N.
7-647-63
Purcell M.
Broady L.[6]
6-26-2
Eubanks C.[8]
Brouwer G.
6-46-2
Uchiyama Y.
Ramanathan R.
4-66-46-1
Harris B.
Wolf J.[4]
6-46-717-61
Rybakov A.
Krueger M.[7]
7-6107-5
Galarneau A.
Watanuki Y.
6-36-3
Shelton B.
Hijikata R.
6-36-4
Tu L.
Pervolarakis M.
6-46-3
Shang J.
Holt B.
4-67-616-3
Wu Y.
Habib H.
7-626-2
Mchugh A.
Gojo B.
7-56-2
Koepfer D.[5]
Couacaud E.
6-16-3
Kovacevic A.
Kozlov S.[3]
6-36-746-4
Shimabukuro S.
Fratangelo B.
6-46-3
Van Rijthoven T.[2]
Zhu E.
6-727-657-63