Li Tu vs Michail Pervolarakis — Indianapolis CH Round of 32

Indianapolis CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 July 2022
hard
GRE
Michail Pervolarakis
30 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
Tu L.
6-4 6-3
Pervolarakis M.
Tu L.
662
Pervolarakis M.
430

Li Tu defeated Michail Pervolarakis 6-4 6-3 in the Indianapolis CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Li Tu closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tu L.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Pervolarakis M.

Pervolarakis M.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Serve advantage — Tu L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tu L.Pervolarakis M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
66%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
45%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
57%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
51%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.1
3.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.7
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 44). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tu L.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Pervolarakis M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
5.1
0.0Lost last 6
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
6.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Wu Y.
Kovacevic A.
6-7107-6136-3
Semi-finals
Kovacevic A.
Shelton B.
6-47-5
Wu Y.
Uchiyama Y.
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Wu Y.
Rybakov A.
6-36-3
Kovacevic A.
Koepfer D.[5]
7-57-65
Uchiyama Y.
Eubanks C.[8]
7-636-746-4
Shelton B.
Purcell M.
7-656-4
R16
Purcell M.
Mchugh A.
6-756-36-4
Kovacevic A.
Shimabukuro S.
6-36-4
Eubanks C.[8]
Shang J.
7-56-3
Rybakov A.
Galarneau A.
6-45-76-3
Wu Y.
Gojowczyk P.[1]
6-46-2
Koepfer D.[5]
Tu L.
6-26-3
Uchiyama Y.
Harris B.
6-47-67
Shelton B.
Van Rijthoven T.[2]
6-771-2
R32
Gojowczyk P.[1]
Basavareddy N.
7-647-63
Purcell M.
Broady L.[6]
6-26-2
Eubanks C.[8]
Brouwer G.
6-46-2
Uchiyama Y.
Ramanathan R.
4-66-46-1
Harris B.
Wolf J.[4]
6-46-717-61
Rybakov A.
Krueger M.[7]
7-6107-5
Galarneau A.
Watanuki Y.
6-36-3
Shelton B.
Hijikata R.
6-36-4
Tu L.
Pervolarakis M.
6-46-3
Shang J.
Holt B.
4-67-616-3
Wu Y.
Habib H.
7-626-2
Mchugh A.
Gojo B.
7-56-2
Koepfer D.[5]
Couacaud E.
6-16-3
Kovacevic A.
Kozlov S.[3]
6-36-746-4
Shimabukuro S.
Fratangelo B.
6-46-3
Van Rijthoven T.[2]
Zhu E.
6-727-657-63