Emilio Nava vs Vasek Pospisil — Pozoblanco CH Round of 16

Pozoblanco CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#86ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 July 2022
hard
CAN5
Vasek Pospisil
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
Nava E.
1-6 7-6 6-2
Pospisil V.
Nava E.
17762
Pospisil V.
66421

Emilio Nava defeated Vasek Pospisil 1-6 7-6 6-2 in the Pozoblanco CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Emilio Nava came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nava E.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Pospisil V.

Pospisil V.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Nava E.Pospisil V.
39
Serve
—
21
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nava E.Pospisil V.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
78%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
64%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.7
9.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 111). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nava E.Pospisil V.
Clutch Rating·Even
52
49
Break points saved·Even
94
96
Break points won·Slight edge
17
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
62
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nava E.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Pospisil V.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
4.0
Surface form
5.1
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nava E.Pospisil V.
Freshness·
96
—

Nava E.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Lestienne C.[2]
Barrere G.[7]
6-07-63
Semi-finals
Barrere G.[7]
Humbert U.[3]
7-647-65
Lestienne C.[2]
Masur D.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Masur D.
Moro Canas A.
7-647-63
Humbert U.[3]
Nava E.
6-26-4
Barrere G.[7]
Janvier M.
6-26-4
Lestienne C.[2]
Escoffier A.[8]
6-16-1
R16
Moro Canas A.
Kuznetsov A.
6-46-0
Masur D.
Grenier H.[4]
6-26-4
Barrere G.[7]
Added D.
6-46-746-1
Nava E.
Pospisil V.[5]
1-67-646-2
Humbert U.[3]
Jubb P.
7-52-67-64
Janvier M.
Bellier A.
6-767-57-64
Escoffier A.[8]
Geerts M.
6-16-3
Lestienne C.[2]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-16-4
R32
Lestienne C.[2]
Moriya H.
6-16-4
Seyboth Wild T.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-16-4
Escoffier A.[8]
Jasika O.
6-36-716-4
Masur D.
Sanchez Jover C.
2-67-636-4
Nava E.
Hoang A.
7-636-766-3
Jubb P.
Merida Aguilar D.
6-16-2
Humbert U.[3]
Blanch D.
6-26-1
Barrere G.[7]
Basic M.
6-46-3
Bellier A.
Borges N.[1]
6-46-3
Grenier H.[4]
Gray A.
6-46-1
Geerts M.
Montes De La Torre I.
6-46-4
Kuznetsov A.
Marozsan F.
7-56-3
Moro Canas A.
Celikbilek A.[6]
7-636-3
Janvier M.
Ionel N.
6-37-5
Added D.
Zeballos F.
6-36-1
Pospisil V.[5]
Alvarez Varona N.
6-36-3