Gerald Melzer vs Mats Moraing — Tampere CH Round of 32

Tampere CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUT
Gerald Melzer
36 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 July 2022
clay
GER2
Mats Moraing
34 yrs · 198 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLW
Melzer G.
6-7 6-4 6-1
Moraing M.
Melzer G.
65662
Moraing M.
77411

Gerald Melzer defeated Mats Moraing 6-7 6-4 6-1 in the Tampere CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Mats Moraing came in defending last year's round of 32, but Gerald Melzer had arrived on a 4-match winning run.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Melzer G.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Moraing M.

Moraing M.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Melzer G.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Melzer G.Moraing M.
1st serve in·Even
59%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
75%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
45%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.9
8.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (77 vs 64). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Melzer G.Moraing M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
34
40
Break points saved·Slight edge
77
86
Break points won·Even
20
18
Deciding sets·Clear edge
53
66
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
29
18

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Melzer G.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Moraing M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
3.2
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.2
Minutes 14d
6.3
0.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Piros Z.[5]
Mayot H.
6-21-66-4
Semi-finals
Mayot H.
Cerundolo J.[1]
6-736-36-1
Piros Z.[5]
Lokoli L.
5-2
Quarter-finals
Piros Z.[5]
Marterer M.[3]
6-36-3
Mayot H.
Sels J.
6-43-66-2
Cerundolo J.[1]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-16-2
Lokoli L.
Melzer G.
7-654-67-5
R16
Ferreira Silva F.
Kicker N.
7-657-5
Cerundolo J.[1]
Giustino L.
7-626-1
Melzer G.
Ofner S.
6-37-64
Piros Z.[5]
Sorrentino L.
3-67-6106-2
Marterer M.[3]
Furness E.
6-36-1
Lokoli L.
Tirante T.[6]
3-66-26-3
Mayot H.
Domingues J.
7-57-5
Sels J.
Rodionov J.[4]
7-57-63
R32
Marterer M.[3]
Forejtek J.
6-26-0
Furness E.
Stebe C.
7-56-3
Tirante T.[6]
Horansky F.
6-36-2
Ofner S.
Torres J.
7-636-3
Rodionov J.[4]
Echargui M.
4-66-17-5
Cerundolo J.[1]
Miedler L.
7-626-2
Sorrentino L.
Virtanen O.
6-44-66-4
Sels J.
Tabur C.
6-36-3
Domingues J.
Kuzmanov D.[7]
6-37-5
Melzer G.
Moraing M.[2]
6-756-46-1
Lokoli L.
Fils A.
6-746-46-2
Piros Z.[5]
Borg L.
6-26-3
Mayot H.
Vasa E.
6-46-4
Kicker N.
Giannessi A.[8]
6-46-3
Ferreira Silva F.
Ajdukovic D.
2-66-47-61
Giustino L.
Niklas Salminen P.
6-26-3