Harold Mayot vs Jelle Sels — Tampere CH Quarter-final

Tampere CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Harold Mayot
FRA
Harold Mayot
#200ATP
1571ELO
1546Clay ELO
$72kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 July 2022
clay
NED
Jelle Sels
#524ATP
1313ELO
1283Clay ELO
30 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLLW
Mayot H.
6-4 3-6 6-2
Sels J.
Mayot H.
6362
Sels J.
4621

Harold Mayot defeated Jelle Sels 6-4 3-6 6-2 in the Tampere CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Harold Mayot closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mayot H.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Sels J.

Sels J.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Mayot H.

Serve advantage — Mayot H.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mayot H.Sels J.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.3
4.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mayot H.Sels J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
29
15
Break points saved·Dominant
92
61
Break points won·Clear edge
22
4
Deciding sets·Slight edge
32
40
Tiebreaks·Even
8
11

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mayot H.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Sels J.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.8+263 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.2Clay Elo 1283
8.7Overall Elo 1571
ELO gap
1.3Overall Elo 1313
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.2
Surface form
3.7
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.3
Minutes 14d
7.4
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mayot H.Sels J.
Freshness·Even
99
100

Mayot H.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Sels J.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Piros Z.[5]
Mayot H.
6-21-66-4
Semi-finals
Mayot H.
Cerundolo J.[1]
6-736-36-1
Piros Z.[5]
Lokoli L.
5-2
Quarter-finals
Piros Z.[5]
Marterer M.[3]
6-36-3
Mayot H.
Sels J.
6-43-66-2
Cerundolo J.[1]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-16-2
Lokoli L.
Melzer G.
7-654-67-5
R16
Ferreira Silva F.
Kicker N.
7-657-5
Cerundolo J.[1]
Giustino L.
7-626-1
Melzer G.
Ofner S.
6-37-64
Piros Z.[5]
Sorrentino L.
3-67-6106-2
Marterer M.[3]
Furness E.
6-36-1
Lokoli L.
Tirante T.[6]
3-66-26-3
Mayot H.
Domingues J.
7-57-5
Sels J.
Rodionov J.[4]
7-57-63
R32
Marterer M.[3]
Forejtek J.
6-26-0
Furness E.
Stebe C.
7-56-3
Tirante T.[6]
Horansky F.
6-36-2
Ofner S.
Torres J.
7-636-3
Rodionov J.[4]
Echargui M.
4-66-17-5
Cerundolo J.[1]
Miedler L.
7-626-2
Sorrentino L.
Virtanen O.
6-44-66-4
Sels J.
Tabur C.
6-36-3
Domingues J.
Kuzmanov D.[7]
6-37-5
Melzer G.
Moraing M.[2]
6-756-46-1
Lokoli L.
Fils A.
6-746-46-2
Piros Z.[5]
Borg L.
6-26-3
Mayot H.
Vasa E.
6-46-4
Kicker N.
Giannessi A.[8]
6-46-3
Ferreira Silva F.
Ajdukovic D.
2-66-47-61
Giustino L.
Niklas Salminen P.
6-26-3