Emilio Nava vs Antoine Hoang — Pozoblanco CH Round of 32

Pozoblanco CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 July 2022
hard
FRA
Antoine Hoang
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
Nava E.
7-6 6-7 6-3
Hoang A.
Nava E.
776662
Hoang A.
637831

Emilio Nava defeated Antoine Hoang 7-6 6-7 6-3 in the Pozoblanco CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Emilio Nava came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Emilio Nava closed it out in three sets, 7–6 6–7 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nava E.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Hoang A.

Hoang A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Serve advantage — Nava E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Nava E.Hoang A.
39
Serve
—
21
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nava E.Hoang A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
64%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
3.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 48). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nava E.Hoang A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
52
18
Break points saved·Clear edge
94
81
Break points won·Even
17
15
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
5
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
23
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nava E.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Hoang A.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
2.1
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nava E.Hoang A.
Freshness·
96
—

Nava E.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Lestienne C.[2]
Barrere G.[7]
6-07-63
Semi-finals
Barrere G.[7]
Humbert U.[3]
7-647-65
Lestienne C.[2]
Masur D.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Masur D.
Moro Canas A.
7-647-63
Humbert U.[3]
Nava E.
6-26-4
Barrere G.[7]
Janvier M.
6-26-4
Lestienne C.[2]
Escoffier A.[8]
6-16-1
R16
Moro Canas A.
Kuznetsov A.
6-46-0
Masur D.
Grenier H.[4]
6-26-4
Barrere G.[7]
Added D.
6-46-746-1
Nava E.
Pospisil V.[5]
1-67-646-2
Humbert U.[3]
Jubb P.
7-52-67-64
Janvier M.
Bellier A.
6-767-57-64
Escoffier A.[8]
Geerts M.
6-16-3
Lestienne C.[2]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-16-4
R32
Lestienne C.[2]
Moriya H.
6-16-4
Seyboth Wild T.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-16-4
Escoffier A.[8]
Jasika O.
6-36-716-4
Masur D.
Sanchez Jover C.
2-67-636-4
Nava E.
Hoang A.
7-636-766-3
Jubb P.
Merida Aguilar D.
6-16-2
Humbert U.[3]
Blanch D.
6-26-1
Barrere G.[7]
Basic M.
6-46-3
Bellier A.
Borges N.[1]
6-46-3
Grenier H.[4]
Gray A.
6-46-1
Geerts M.
Montes De La Torre I.
6-46-4
Kuznetsov A.
Marozsan F.
7-56-3
Moro Canas A.
Celikbilek A.[6]
7-636-3
Janvier M.
Ionel N.
6-37-5
Added D.
Zeballos F.
6-36-1
Pospisil V.[5]
Alvarez Varona N.
6-36-3