Aidan Mchugh vs Borna Gojo — Indianapolis CH Round of 32

Indianapolis CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GBR
Aidan Mchugh
#489ATP
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 July 2022
hard
Borna Gojo
CRO
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
Mchugh A.
7-5 6-2
Gojo B.
Mchugh A.
762
Gojo B.
520

Aidan Mchugh defeated Borna Gojo 7-5 6-2 in the Indianapolis CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Aidan Mchugh closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mchugh A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Gojo B.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Mchugh A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mchugh A.Gojo B.
1st serve in·Even
65%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
67%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
67%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.2
10.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (93 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mchugh A.Gojo B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
23
53
Break points saved·Clear edge
72
95
Break points won·Slight edge
5
10
Deciding sets·Clear edge
49
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
11
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mchugh A.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gojo B.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.7
Surface form
6.4
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
3.2
Minutes 14d
9.0
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mchugh A.Gojo B.
Freshness·
—
100

Gojo B.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Wu Y.
Kovacevic A.
6-7107-6136-3
Semi-finals
Kovacevic A.
Shelton B.
6-47-5
Wu Y.
Uchiyama Y.
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Wu Y.
Rybakov A.
6-36-3
Kovacevic A.
Koepfer D.[5]
7-57-65
Uchiyama Y.
Eubanks C.[8]
7-636-746-4
Shelton B.
Purcell M.
7-656-4
R16
Purcell M.
Mchugh A.
6-756-36-4
Kovacevic A.
Shimabukuro S.
6-36-4
Eubanks C.[8]
Shang J.
7-56-3
Rybakov A.
Galarneau A.
6-45-76-3
Wu Y.
Gojowczyk P.[1]
6-46-2
Koepfer D.[5]
Tu L.
6-26-3
Uchiyama Y.
Harris B.
6-47-67
Shelton B.
Van Rijthoven T.[2]
6-771-2
R32
Gojowczyk P.[1]
Basavareddy N.
7-647-63
Purcell M.
Broady L.[6]
6-26-2
Eubanks C.[8]
Brouwer G.
6-46-2
Uchiyama Y.
Ramanathan R.
4-66-46-1
Harris B.
Wolf J.[4]
6-46-717-61
Rybakov A.
Krueger M.[7]
7-6107-5
Galarneau A.
Watanuki Y.
6-36-3
Shelton B.
Hijikata R.
6-36-4
Tu L.
Pervolarakis M.
6-46-3
Shang J.
Holt B.
4-67-616-3
Wu Y.
Habib H.
7-626-2
Mchugh A.
Gojo B.
7-56-2
Koepfer D.[5]
Couacaud E.
6-16-3
Kovacevic A.
Kozlov S.[3]
6-36-746-4
Shimabukuro S.
Fratangelo B.
6-46-3
Van Rijthoven T.[2]
Zhu E.
6-727-657-63