Evan Furness vs Cedrik Marcel Stebe — Tampere CH Round of 32

Tampere CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA
Evan Furness
27 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 July 2022
clay
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
GER
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
#366ATP
1556ELO
1545Clay ELO
35 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWW
Furness E.
7-5 6-3
Stebe C.
Furness E.
762
Stebe C.
530

Evan Furness defeated Cedrik Marcel Stebe 7-5 6-3 in the Tampere CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Evan Furness closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Furness E.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Stebe C.

Stebe C.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Furness E.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Furness E.Stebe C.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Even
3.0
3.4
Double faults / match·Even
3.2
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (113 vs 91). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Furness E.Stebe C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
22
51
Break points saved·Dominant
47
75
Break points won·Slight edge
18
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
44
86
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
49
68

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Furness E.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Stebe C.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
4.0
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
8.1
4.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Piros Z.[5]
Mayot H.
6-21-66-4
Semi-finals
Mayot H.
Cerundolo J.[1]
6-736-36-1
Piros Z.[5]
Lokoli L.
5-2
Quarter-finals
Piros Z.[5]
Marterer M.[3]
6-36-3
Mayot H.
Sels J.
6-43-66-2
Cerundolo J.[1]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-16-2
Lokoli L.
Melzer G.
7-654-67-5
R16
Ferreira Silva F.
Kicker N.
7-657-5
Cerundolo J.[1]
Giustino L.
7-626-1
Melzer G.
Ofner S.
6-37-64
Piros Z.[5]
Sorrentino L.
3-67-6106-2
Marterer M.[3]
Furness E.
6-36-1
Lokoli L.
Tirante T.[6]
3-66-26-3
Mayot H.
Domingues J.
7-57-5
Sels J.
Rodionov J.[4]
7-57-63
R32
Marterer M.[3]
Forejtek J.
6-26-0
Furness E.
Stebe C.
7-56-3
Tirante T.[6]
Horansky F.
6-36-2
Ofner S.
Torres J.
7-636-3
Rodionov J.[4]
Echargui M.
4-66-17-5
Cerundolo J.[1]
Miedler L.
7-626-2
Sorrentino L.
Virtanen O.
6-44-66-4
Sels J.
Tabur C.
6-36-3
Domingues J.
Kuzmanov D.[7]
6-37-5
Melzer G.
Moraing M.[2]
6-756-46-1
Lokoli L.
Fils A.
6-746-46-2
Piros Z.[5]
Borg L.
6-26-3
Mayot H.
Vasa E.
6-46-4
Kicker N.
Giannessi A.[8]
6-46-3
Ferreira Silva F.
Ajdukovic D.
2-66-47-61
Giustino L.
Niklas Salminen P.
6-26-3