Christopher Eubanks vs Juncheng Shang — Indianapolis CH Round of 16

Indianapolis CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA8
Christopher Eubanks
#788ATP
1523ELO
1493Hard ELO
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 July 2022
hard
CHN
Juncheng Shang
#274ATP
1746ELO
1698Hard ELO
21 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWW
Eubanks C.
7-5 6-3
Shang J.
Eubanks C.
762
Shang J.
530

Christopher Eubanks defeated Juncheng Shang 7-5 6-3 in the Indianapolis CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Eubanks C.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Shang J.

Shang J.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Eubanks C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Eubanks C.Shang J.
—
Serve
34
—
Return
18

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Eubanks C.Shang J.
1st serve in·Even
68%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
53%
Service points won·Even
67%
63%
Return points won·Even
33%
37%
Break points saved·Even
64%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.4
3.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.2
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 197). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Eubanks C.Shang J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
50
76
Break points saved·Even
96
96
Break points won·Dominant
3
45
Deciding sets·Dominant
67
94
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
74
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Eubanks C.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Shang J.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.4Hard Elo 1493
Surface ELO
7.6+205 Hard Elo edge
2.2Overall Elo 1523
ELO gap
7.8Overall Elo 1746
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
3.6
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.8
Minutes 14d
7.1
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Wu Y.
Kovacevic A.
6-7107-6136-3
Semi-finals
Kovacevic A.
Shelton B.
6-47-5
Wu Y.
Uchiyama Y.
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Wu Y.
Rybakov A.
6-36-3
Kovacevic A.
Koepfer D.[5]
7-57-65
Uchiyama Y.
Eubanks C.[8]
7-636-746-4
Shelton B.
Purcell M.
7-656-4
R16
Purcell M.
Mchugh A.
6-756-36-4
Kovacevic A.
Shimabukuro S.
6-36-4
Eubanks C.[8]
Shang J.
7-56-3
Rybakov A.
Galarneau A.
6-45-76-3
Wu Y.
Gojowczyk P.[1]
6-46-2
Koepfer D.[5]
Tu L.
6-26-3
Uchiyama Y.
Harris B.
6-47-67
Shelton B.
Van Rijthoven T.[2]
6-771-2
R32
Gojowczyk P.[1]
Basavareddy N.
7-647-63
Purcell M.
Broady L.[6]
6-26-2
Eubanks C.[8]
Brouwer G.
6-46-2
Uchiyama Y.
Ramanathan R.
4-66-46-1
Harris B.
Wolf J.[4]
6-46-717-61
Rybakov A.
Krueger M.[7]
7-6107-5
Galarneau A.
Watanuki Y.
6-36-3
Shelton B.
Hijikata R.
6-36-4
Tu L.
Pervolarakis M.
6-46-3
Shang J.
Holt B.
4-67-616-3
Wu Y.
Habib H.
7-626-2
Mchugh A.
Gojo B.
7-56-2
Koepfer D.[5]
Couacaud E.
6-16-3
Kovacevic A.
Kozlov S.[3]
6-36-746-4
Shimabukuro S.
Fratangelo B.
6-46-3
Van Rijthoven T.[2]
Zhu E.
6-727-657-63