Liam Draxl vs Zachary Svajda — Indianapolis CH Qualifying Round 1

Indianapolis CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
Liam Draxl
CAN
Liam Draxl
#223ATP
1592ELO
1565Hard ELO
$201kYTD
$642kCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 July 2022
hard
Zachary Svajda
USA9
Zachary Svajda
#72ATP
1718ELO
1690Hard ELO
$631kYTD
$1.9MCAREER
23 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLWLW
Draxl L.
7-6 6-3
Svajda Z.
Draxl L.
7762
Svajda Z.
6130

Liam Draxl defeated Zachary Svajda 7-6 6-3 in the Indianapolis CH qualifying round 1 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Zachary Svajda came in ranked #72, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Liam Draxl claimed a first win over Zachary Svajda in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Liam Draxl closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-02-16Delray BeachQ1hardZachary Svajda6-2 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Draxl L.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Svajda Z.

Svajda Z.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Draxl L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Draxl L.Svajda Z.
—
Serve
30
—
Return
12

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Draxl L.Svajda Z.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
53%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.1
5.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (177 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Draxl L.Svajda Z.
Clutch Rating·Even
66
69
Break points saved·Slight edge
83
89
Break points won·Dominant
36
66
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
69
Tiebreaks·Even
75
75

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Draxl L.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Svajda Z.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
3.4Hard Elo 1565
Surface ELO
6.6+125 Hard Elo edge
3.5Overall Elo 1592
ELO gap
6.5Overall Elo 1718
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
4.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Draxl L.Svajda Z.
Freshness·Clear edge
98
86

Draxl L.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Svajda Z.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Habib H.[11]
Brymer G.
7-637-5
Zhu E.[10]
Blanch U.[5]
7-56-4
Mchugh A.[4]
Mochizuki S.[8]
3-67-627-68
Holt B.[3]
Draxl L.
3-67-646-3
Shang J.[12]
Harris B.[2]
6-46-796-3
Shimabukuro S.[7]
Hsu Y.[1]
6-36-2
Q1
Harris B.[2]
Smith J.
6-37-63
Mchugh A.[4]
Nanda G.
7-657-63
Habib H.[11]
Schneider R.
7-656-1
Draxl L.
Svajda Z.[9]
7-616-3
Brymer G.
Smith K.[6]
6-46-4
Zhu E.[10]
Pannu K.
6-45-77-5
Blanch U.[5]
Chappell N.
6-37-5
Mochizuki S.[8]
Kirchheimer S.
7-656-2
Holt B.[3]
Baadi T.
6-736-26-4
Shang J.[12]
Kim A.
6-27-5
Hsu Y.[1]
Mukund S.
7-647-5