Ulises Blanch vs Nick Chappell — Indianapolis CH Qualifying Round 1

Indianapolis CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
USA5
Ulises Blanch
#1661ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 July 2022
hard
USA
Nick Chappell
#1489ATP
33 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWL
Blanch U.
6-3 7-5
Chappell N.
Blanch U.
672
Chappell N.
350

Ulises Blanch defeated Nick Chappell 6-3 7-5 in the Indianapolis CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Ulises Blanch closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Blanch U.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Chappell N.

Chappell N.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Blanch U.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Blanch U.Chappell N.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.3
3.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (113 vs 101). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Blanch U.Chappell N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
19
0
Break points saved·Dominant
83
29
Break points won·Slight edge
2
8
Deciding sets·Clear edge
19
3
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
37
13

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Blanch U.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Chappell N.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
3.2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
5.8
Minutes 14d
8.3
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Habib H.[11]
Brymer G.
7-637-5
Zhu E.[10]
Blanch U.[5]
7-56-4
Mchugh A.[4]
Mochizuki S.[8]
3-67-627-68
Holt B.[3]
Draxl L.
3-67-646-3
Shang J.[12]
Harris B.[2]
6-46-796-3
Shimabukuro S.[7]
Hsu Y.[1]
6-36-2
Q1
Harris B.[2]
Smith J.
6-37-63
Mchugh A.[4]
Nanda G.
7-657-63
Habib H.[11]
Schneider R.
7-656-1
Draxl L.
Svajda Z.[9]
7-616-3
Brymer G.
Smith K.[6]
6-46-4
Zhu E.[10]
Pannu K.
6-45-77-5
Blanch U.[5]
Chappell N.
6-37-5
Mochizuki S.[8]
Kirchheimer S.
7-656-2
Holt B.[3]
Baadi T.
6-736-26-4
Shang J.[12]
Kim A.
6-27-5
Hsu Y.[1]
Mukund S.
7-647-5