Yasutaka Uchiyama vs Li Tu — Rome CH Round of 32

Rome CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Yasutaka Uchiyama
JPN
Yasutaka Uchiyama
#336ATP
1463ELO
1348Clay ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 July 2022
clay
AUS
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1370Clay ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Uchiyama Y.
6-3 6-3
Tu L.
Uchiyama Y.
662
Tu L.
330

Yasutaka Uchiyama defeated Li Tu 6-3 6-3 in the Rome CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Uchiyama Y.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Tu L.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Uchiyama Y.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Uchiyama Y.Tu L.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
64%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.9
6.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Uchiyama Y.Tu L.
Clutch Rating·Even
30
27
Break points saved·Slight edge
91
82
Break points won·Slight edge
2
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
45
20
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
64

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Uchiyama Y.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Tu L.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
4.0Clay Elo 1348
Surface ELO
6.0+23 Clay Elo edge
4.5Overall Elo 1463
ELO gap
5.5Overall Elo 1488
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.4
Surface form
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Agamenone F.
Moroni G.
6-16-4
Wu Y.
Shelton B.
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Moroni G.
Halys Q.[1]
7-646-3
Agamenone F.
Cobolli F.[3]
6-36-4
Wu Y.
Ficovich J.[4]
6-16-0
Shelton B.
Uchiyama Y.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Agamenone F.
Zeppieri G.
7-56-4
Moroni G.
Kirkin E.
6-46-3
Halys Q.[1]
De Jong J.
4-66-47-66
Cobolli F.[3]
De Schepper K.
3-67-656-3
Wu Y.
Wolf J.[2]
6-46-1
Uchiyama Y.
Nishioka Y.[1]
3-67-626-1
Shelton B.
Kovacevic A.
7-627-5
Ficovich J.[4]
Fratangelo B.[7]
6-47-65
R16
Zeppieri G.
Draper J.[2]
6-16-4
Cobolli F.[3]
Fabbiano T.
6-46-746-2
Moroni G.
Yevseyev D.
6-06-1
De Jong J.
Arnaldi M.
6-13-66-3
De Schepper K.
Grenier H.[7]
6-36-3
Kirkin E.
Riedi L.
2-66-36-4
Agamenone F.
Eysseric J.
6-42-67-5
Halys Q.[1]
Geerts M.
7-616-3
Fratangelo B.[7]
Habib H.
6-35-76-2
Kovacevic A.
Kirchheimer S.
6-34-66-4
Uchiyama Y.
Hsu Y.
7-646-2
Wolf J.[2]
Mochizuki S.
6-37-61
Wu Y.
Blanch U.
6-36-4
Shelton B.
Rybakov A.
7-646-3
Nishioka Y.[1]
Galarneau A.
6-46-3
Ficovich J.[4]
Quiroz R.
W/O
R32
Zeppieri G.
Napolitano S.
6-26-2
Eysseric J.
Van Assche L.
6-36-4
Agamenone F.
Guinard M.[6]
6-36-2
Fabbiano T.
Caruso S.
7-53-67-5
Grenier H.[7]
Hoang A.
6-34-66-4
Arnaldi M.
Milojevic N.[5]
2-66-46-0
Geerts M.
Pellegrino A.
4-67-656-2
De Jong J.
Kuznetsov A.
6-26-1
De Schepper K.
Celikbilek A.
6-35-76-4
Cobolli F.[3]
Coric B.
4-66-36-4
Draper J.[2]
Skatov T.
6-26-1
Riedi L.
Serdarusic N.
3-67-56-3
Kirkin E.
Stebe C.
6-47-63
Halys Q.[1]
Couacaud E.
7-6106-4
Moroni G.
Simon G.[8]
6-16-4
Yevseyev D.
Giannessi A.
7-653-2
Galarneau A.
Harris B.
6-26-1
Mochizuki S.
Riffice S.
7-627-62
Rybakov A.
Couacaud E.[8]
6-36-5
Uchiyama Y.
Tu L.
6-36-3
Wolf J.[2]
Shang J.
6-16-2
Blanch U.
Mmoh M.[6]
6-31-66-4
Ficovich J.[4]
Mchugh A.
6-26-2
Fratangelo B.[7]
Pervolarakis M.
6-46-0
Kovacevic A.
Young D.
4-66-26-1
Kirchheimer S.
Gomez E.[3]
6-47-61
Hsu Y.
Gojo B.[5]
6-46-4
Nishioka Y.[1]
Kypson P.
6-26-1
Quiroz R.
Smith K.
4-66-16-1
Shelton B.
Nanda G.
4-66-26-3
Habib H.
Hijikata R.
6-726-37-66
Wu Y.
Jaziri M.
6-44-0