Yibing Wu vs Ben Shelton — Rome CH Final

Rome CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Yibing Wu
CHN
Yibing Wu
#106ATP
1743ELO
1670Clay ELO
$472kYTD
$1.9MCAREER
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 July 2022
clay
Ben Shelton
USA
Ben Shelton
#6ATP
1960ELO
1845Clay ELO
$2.2MYTD
$14MCAREER
23 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWLW
Wu Y.
7-5 6-3
Shelton B.
Wu Y.
762
Shelton B.
530

Yibing Wu defeated Ben Shelton 7-5 6-3 in the Rome CH final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Ben Shelton came in ranked #6, but Yibing Wu had arrived on a 5-match winning run.

Key context

  • Match story: Yibing Wu closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wu Y.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Shelton B.

Shelton B.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Wu Y.

Serve advantage — Wu Y.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Wu Y.Shelton B.
—
Serve
100
—
Return
0

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Wu Y.Shelton B.
1st serve in·Even
62%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
54%
Service points won·Even
64%
68%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
70%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.0
9.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (145 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wu Y.Shelton B.
Clutch Rating·Even
82
85
Break points saved·Slight edge
94
100
Break points won·Even
57
58
Deciding sets·Even
97
98
Tiebreaks·Even
97
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wu Y.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 35 days (−1.0)
Shelton B.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
2.6Clay Elo 1670
Surface ELO
7.4+175 Clay Elo edge
2.9Overall Elo 1743
ELO gap
7.1Overall Elo 1960
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.9
Surface form
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0
Opponent rise
2.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wu Y.Shelton B.
Freshness·Dominant
67
95

Wu Y.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 72 games (7d) · Shelton B.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Agamenone F.
Moroni G.
6-16-4
Wu Y.
Shelton B.
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Moroni G.
Halys Q.[1]
7-646-3
Agamenone F.
Cobolli F.[3]
6-36-4
Wu Y.
Ficovich J.[4]
6-16-0
Shelton B.
Uchiyama Y.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Agamenone F.
Zeppieri G.
7-56-4
Moroni G.
Kirkin E.
6-46-3
Halys Q.[1]
De Jong J.
4-66-47-66
Cobolli F.[3]
De Schepper K.
3-67-656-3
Wu Y.
Wolf J.[2]
6-46-1
Uchiyama Y.
Nishioka Y.[1]
3-67-626-1
Shelton B.
Kovacevic A.
7-627-5
Ficovich J.[4]
Fratangelo B.[7]
6-47-65
R16
Zeppieri G.
Draper J.[2]
6-16-4
Cobolli F.[3]
Fabbiano T.
6-46-746-2
Moroni G.
Yevseyev D.
6-06-1
De Jong J.
Arnaldi M.
6-13-66-3
De Schepper K.
Grenier H.[7]
6-36-3
Kirkin E.
Riedi L.
2-66-36-4
Agamenone F.
Eysseric J.
6-42-67-5
Halys Q.[1]
Geerts M.
7-616-3
Fratangelo B.[7]
Habib H.
6-35-76-2
Kovacevic A.
Kirchheimer S.
6-34-66-4
Uchiyama Y.
Hsu Y.
7-646-2
Wolf J.[2]
Mochizuki S.
6-37-61
Wu Y.
Blanch U.
6-36-4
Shelton B.
Rybakov A.
7-646-3
Nishioka Y.[1]
Galarneau A.
6-46-3
Ficovich J.[4]
Quiroz R.
W/O
R32
Zeppieri G.
Napolitano S.
6-26-2
Eysseric J.
Van Assche L.
6-36-4
Agamenone F.
Guinard M.[6]
6-36-2
Fabbiano T.
Caruso S.
7-53-67-5
Grenier H.[7]
Hoang A.
6-34-66-4
Arnaldi M.
Milojevic N.[5]
2-66-46-0
Geerts M.
Pellegrino A.
4-67-656-2
De Jong J.
Kuznetsov A.
6-26-1
De Schepper K.
Celikbilek A.
6-35-76-4
Cobolli F.[3]
Coric B.
4-66-36-4
Draper J.[2]
Skatov T.
6-26-1
Riedi L.
Serdarusic N.
3-67-56-3
Kirkin E.
Stebe C.
6-47-63
Halys Q.[1]
Couacaud E.
7-6106-4
Moroni G.
Simon G.[8]
6-16-4
Yevseyev D.
Giannessi A.
7-653-2
Galarneau A.
Harris B.
6-26-1
Mochizuki S.
Riffice S.
7-627-62
Rybakov A.
Couacaud E.[8]
6-36-5
Uchiyama Y.
Tu L.
6-36-3
Wolf J.[2]
Shang J.
6-16-2
Blanch U.
Mmoh M.[6]
6-31-66-4
Ficovich J.[4]
Mchugh A.
6-26-2
Fratangelo B.[7]
Pervolarakis M.
6-46-0
Kovacevic A.
Young D.
4-66-26-1
Kirchheimer S.
Gomez E.[3]
6-47-61
Hsu Y.
Gojo B.[5]
6-46-4
Nishioka Y.[1]
Kypson P.
6-26-1
Quiroz R.
Smith K.
4-66-16-1
Shelton B.
Nanda G.
4-66-26-3
Habib H.
Hijikata R.
6-726-37-66
Wu Y.
Jaziri M.
6-44-0