Zsombor Piros vs Alexander Ritschard — Amersfoort CH Round of 32

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Zsombor Piros
HUN
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1621Clay ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 July 2022
clay
SUI
Alexander Ritschard
#575ATP
1528ELO
1557Clay ELO
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWWLWL
Piros Z.
6-1 7-6
Ritschard A.
Piros Z.
6782
Ritschard A.
1660

Zsombor Piros defeated Alexander Ritschard 6-1 7-6 in the Amersfoort CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Zsombor Piros came in ranked #120.

Key context

  • Match story: Zsombor Piros came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Piros Z.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Ritschard A.

Ritschard A.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Piros Z.Ritschard A.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Even
3.1
3.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Piros Z.Ritschard A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
57
36
Break points saved·Even
84
84
Break points won·Clear edge
32
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
85
41
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
48
59

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Piros Z.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Ritschard A.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
6.3+63 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.7Clay Elo 1557
7.2Overall Elo 1661
ELO gap
2.8Overall Elo 1528
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
5.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.5
Minutes 14d
4.5
7.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Piros Z.Ritschard A.
Freshness·
54
—

Piros Z.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.[1]
Carballes Baena R.[2]
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
6-766-46-3
Griekspoor T.[1]
Gakhov I.
6-23-66-3
Quarter-finals
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Van Assche L.
6-36-4
Gakhov I.
Houkes M.
6-26-747-65
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Daniel T.[5]
6-15-77-63
Griekspoor T.[1]
Sachko V.
6-27-64
R16
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Andreev A.
6-46-4
Daniel T.[5]
Lokoli L.
6-16-2
Gakhov I.
Fils A.
6-36-1
Houkes M.
Taberner C.[4]
6-36-3
Sachko V.
Moraing M.[7]
6-37-66
Griekspoor T.[1]
Piros Z.
6-36-726-3
Van Assche L.
Jong S.
6-06-2
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Lamasine T.
6-16-2
Van Assche L.
Jong A.
6-06-2
R32
Lamasine T.
Kicker N.
7-645-76-3
Andreev A.
Masur D.
7-656-0
Van Assche L.
Bergs Z.[8]
6-34-66-4
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Krumich M.
5-76-26-4
Lokoli L.
Gutierrez O.
6-26-1
Fils A.
Travaglia S.[6]
6-46-2
Taberner C.[4]
Haase R.
7-56-746-2
Moraing M.[7]
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-4
Griekspoor T.[1]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-16-2
Jong S.
Mayot H.
6-47-5
Piros Z.
Ritschard A.
6-17-66
Sachko V.
Collarini A.
6-34-66-4
Gakhov I.
Wassermann D.
6-47-63
Daniel T.[5]
Furness E.
6-25-77-63
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Sels J.
6-46-3
Houkes M.
Skatov T.
7-617-64
Jong A.
Mayot H.
6-47-5