Michail Pervolarakis vs Benjamin Sigouin — Rome CH Qualifying Round 1

Rome CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
GRE2
Michail Pervolarakis
30 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 July 2022
clay
CAN
Benjamin Sigouin
27 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Pervolarakis M.
6-3 6-0
Sigouin B.
Pervolarakis M.
662
Sigouin B.
300

Michail Pervolarakis defeated Benjamin Sigouin 6-3 6-0 in the Rome CH qualifying round 1 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Pervolarakis M.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Sigouin B.

Sigouin B.serving60% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Pervolarakis M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Pervolarakis M.Sigouin B.
1st serve in·Even
58%
54%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
41%
Service points won·Slight edge
57%
52%
Return points won·Even
36%
34%
Break points saved·Even
50%
46%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.4
2.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.2
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (44 vs 11). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Pervolarakis M.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Sigouin B.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 357 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Kirkin E.[5]
Gulbis E.[7]
6-36-3
Yevseyev D.[6]
Orlov V.
6-26-4
Eysseric J.
Riedi L.[4]
4-66-36-2
Van Assche L.[11]
Benchetrit E.
2-67-56-2
Geerts M.[2]
Virtanen O.[10]
6-14-66-4
De Schepper K.
Added D.[9]
6-46-0
Kirchheimer S.[11]
Baadi T.
7-57-65
Shelton B.[5]
Draxl L.[9]
6-46-1
Young D.
Pannu K.
7-626-4
Pervolarakis M.[2]
Mukund S.[7]
6-34-66-3
Kypson P.
Maloney P.
6-37-69
Shang J.[1]
Cassone M.
6-43-66-2
Q1
Riedi L.[4]
Del Federico A.
6-36-3
Geerts M.[2]
Capecchi D.
6-12-67-5
Gulbis E.[7]
Sorrentino L.
7-646-3
Kirkin E.[5]
Echeverria J.
6-26-1
Van Assche L.[11]
Di Nicola G.
6-16-0
Orlov V.
Squire H.[8]
6-16-3
Eysseric J.
Sanchez Jover C.[12]
6-06-3
Benchetrit E.
Gautier A.[3]
6-46-3
Virtanen O.[10]
Vilardo F.
6-16-1
De Schepper K.
Vatutin A.[1]
6-46-4
Maloney P.
Shimabukuro S.[4]
7-53-66-3
Baadi T.
Cernoch B.
4-66-36-0
Shang J.[1]
Harrison R.
7-57-5
Shelton B.[5]
Matsui T.
6-06-2
Pervolarakis M.[2]
Sigouin B.
6-36-0
Kypson P.
Chappell N.[8]
6-36-2
Draxl L.[9]
Reinberg E.
6-26-1
Kirchheimer S.[11]
Balaji N.
6-46-1
Young D.
Mcnally J.[12]
0-66-32-0
Pannu K.
Sweeny D.[3]
6-33-66-3
Mukund S.[7]
Uesugi K.
4-67-656-1
Cassone M.
Clark E.[10]
7-646-1