Vitaliy Sachko vs Mats Moraing — Amersfoort CH Round of 16

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Vitaliy Sachko
UKR
Vitaliy Sachko
#198ATP
1584ELO
1550Clay ELO
$158kYTD
$835kCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 July 2022
clay
GER7
Mats Moraing
34 yrs · 198 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLW
Sachko V.
6-3 7-6
Moraing M.
Sachko V.
6782
Moraing M.
3660

Vitaliy Sachko defeated Mats Moraing 6-3 7-6 in the Amersfoort CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Mats Moraing came in defending last year's round of 16, but Vitaliy Sachko had been the form player, winning 6 of their last 8 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sachko V.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Moraing M.

Moraing M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Sachko V.

Serve advantage — Sachko V.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sachko V.Moraing M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
45%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
36%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.4
8.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 64). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sachko V.Moraing M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
51
40
Break points saved·Slight edge
81
86
Break points won·Dominant
48
18
Deciding sets·Slight edge
76
66
Tiebreaks·Even
19
18

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sachko V.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Moraing M.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
2.9
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.8
Minutes 14d
6.9
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Sachko V.Moraing M.
Freshness·
100
—

Sachko V.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.[1]
Carballes Baena R.[2]
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
6-766-46-3
Griekspoor T.[1]
Gakhov I.
6-23-66-3
Quarter-finals
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Van Assche L.
6-36-4
Gakhov I.
Houkes M.
6-26-747-65
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Daniel T.[5]
6-15-77-63
Griekspoor T.[1]
Sachko V.
6-27-64
R16
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Andreev A.
6-46-4
Daniel T.[5]
Lokoli L.
6-16-2
Gakhov I.
Fils A.
6-36-1
Houkes M.
Taberner C.[4]
6-36-3
Sachko V.
Moraing M.[7]
6-37-66
Griekspoor T.[1]
Piros Z.
6-36-726-3
Van Assche L.
Jong S.
6-06-2
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Lamasine T.
6-16-2
Van Assche L.
Jong A.
6-06-2
R32
Lamasine T.
Kicker N.
7-645-76-3
Andreev A.
Masur D.
7-656-0
Van Assche L.
Bergs Z.[8]
6-34-66-4
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Krumich M.
5-76-26-4
Lokoli L.
Gutierrez O.
6-26-1
Fils A.
Travaglia S.[6]
6-46-2
Taberner C.[4]
Haase R.
7-56-746-2
Moraing M.[7]
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-4
Griekspoor T.[1]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-16-2
Jong S.
Mayot H.
6-47-5
Piros Z.
Ritschard A.
6-17-66
Sachko V.
Collarini A.
6-34-66-4
Gakhov I.
Wassermann D.
6-47-63
Daniel T.[5]
Furness E.
6-25-77-63
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Sels J.
6-46-3
Houkes M.
Skatov T.
7-617-64
Jong A.
Mayot H.
6-47-5