Jerome Kym vs Bernard Tomic — Verona CH Round of 32

Verona CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SUI
Jerome Kym
#186ATP
1599ELO
1529Clay ELO
$89kYTD
$731kCAREER
23 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 July 2022
clay
Bernard Tomic
AUS
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1420Clay ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
Kym J.
6-4 7-6
Tomic B.
Kym J.
6772
Tomic B.
4610

Jerome Kym defeated Bernard Tomic 6-4 7-6 in the Verona CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kym J.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Tomic B.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Kym J.

Serve advantage — Kym J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kym J.Tomic B.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
63%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.9
5.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (140 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kym J.Tomic B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
36
53
Break points saved·Even
91
92
Break points won·Clear edge
21
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
17
74
Tiebreaks·Even
80
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kym J.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 70 days (−1.2)
Tomic B.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.7+109 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.3Clay Elo 1420
6.5Overall Elo 1599
ELO gap
3.5Overall Elo 1475
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
4.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.3
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kym J.Tomic B.
Freshness·Clear edge
69
84

Kym J.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 72 games (7d) · Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Maestrelli F.
Cachin P.[1]
3-66-36-0
Semi-finals
Cachin P.[1]
Cecchinato M.[8]
6-7126-07-5
Maestrelli F.
Ofner S.
6-46-766-3
Quarter-finals
Ofner S.
Gombos N.[2]
3-67-636-3
Cachin P.[1]
Kym J.
5-77-646-4
Cecchinato M.[8]
Horansky F.
6-16-2
Maestrelli F.
Cobolli F.[5]
6-36-2
R16
Gombos N.[2]
Gigante M.
7-626-4
Ofner S.
Stebe C.
6-47-65
Cobolli F.[5]
Pellegrino A.
7-51-66-2
Cecchinato M.[8]
Brancaccio R.
6-31-66-2
Kym J.
Muller A.[7]
6-26-4
Cachin P.[1]
Bellucci M.
6-36-4
Maestrelli F.
Bonadio R.
3-67-666-2
Horansky F.
Agamenone F.[4]
3-66-36-4
R32
Gombos N.[2]
Zeppieri G.
7-696-4
Ofner S.
Giannessi A.
6-36-3
Maestrelli F.
Simon G.
6-36-2
Cobolli F.[5]
Arnaboldi A.
6-41-66-3
Brancaccio R.
Popko D.
6-14-66-2
Horansky F.
Vavassori A.
2-66-46-4
Agamenone F.[4]
Caruso S.
6-36-4
Cecchinato M.[8]
Tirante T.
7-56-3
Pellegrino A.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-46-2
Kym J.
Tomic B.
6-47-61
Bellucci M.
Gaio F.
7-56-4
Stebe C.
Milojevic N.[6]
6-06-4
Bonadio R.
Mager G.[3]
6-43-66-1
Cachin P.[1]
Serdarusic N.
6-47-5
Gigante M.
Nardi L.
6-43-67-60
Muller A.[7]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-14-2