Jerome Kym vs Alexandre Muller — Verona CH Round of 16

Verona CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
SUI
Jerome Kym
#186ATP
1599ELO
1529Clay ELO
$89kYTD
$731kCAREER
23 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 July 2022
clay
Alexandre Muller
FRA7
Alexandre Muller
#132ATP
1665ELO
1628Clay ELO
$426kYTD
$4.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Kym J.
6-2 6-4
Muller A.
Kym J.
662
Muller A.
240

Jerome Kym defeated Alexandre Muller 6-2 6-4 in the Verona CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Alexandre Muller came in ranked #132, but Jerome Kym had been the form player, winning 3 of their last 5 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kym J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Muller A.

Muller A.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Kym J.

Serve advantage — Kym J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kym J.Muller A.
1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
63%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.9
3.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (140 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kym J.Muller A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
36
75
Break points saved·Even
91
94
Break points won·Clear edge
21
44
Deciding sets·Dominant
17
95
Tiebreaks·Even
80
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kym J.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 70 days (−1.2)
Muller A.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
3.7Clay Elo 1529
Surface ELO
6.3+100 Clay Elo edge
4.1Overall Elo 1599
ELO gap
5.9Overall Elo 1665
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
7.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.1
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kym J.Muller A.
Freshness·Dominant
69
100

Kym J.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 72 games (7d) · Muller A.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Maestrelli F.
Cachin P.[1]
3-66-36-0
Semi-finals
Cachin P.[1]
Cecchinato M.[8]
6-7126-07-5
Maestrelli F.
Ofner S.
6-46-766-3
Quarter-finals
Ofner S.
Gombos N.[2]
3-67-636-3
Cachin P.[1]
Kym J.
5-77-646-4
Cecchinato M.[8]
Horansky F.
6-16-2
Maestrelli F.
Cobolli F.[5]
6-36-2
R16
Gombos N.[2]
Gigante M.
7-626-4
Ofner S.
Stebe C.
6-47-65
Cobolli F.[5]
Pellegrino A.
7-51-66-2
Cecchinato M.[8]
Brancaccio R.
6-31-66-2
Kym J.
Muller A.[7]
6-26-4
Cachin P.[1]
Bellucci M.
6-36-4
Maestrelli F.
Bonadio R.
3-67-666-2
Horansky F.
Agamenone F.[4]
3-66-36-4
R32
Gombos N.[2]
Zeppieri G.
7-696-4
Ofner S.
Giannessi A.
6-36-3
Maestrelli F.
Simon G.
6-36-2
Cobolli F.[5]
Arnaboldi A.
6-41-66-3
Brancaccio R.
Popko D.
6-14-66-2
Horansky F.
Vavassori A.
2-66-46-4
Agamenone F.[4]
Caruso S.
6-36-4
Cecchinato M.[8]
Tirante T.
7-56-3
Pellegrino A.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-46-2
Kym J.
Tomic B.
6-47-61
Bellucci M.
Gaio F.
7-56-4
Stebe C.
Milojevic N.[6]
6-06-4
Bonadio R.
Mager G.[3]
6-43-66-1
Cachin P.[1]
Serdarusic N.
6-47-5
Gigante M.
Nardi L.
6-43-67-60
Muller A.[7]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-14-2