Jason Kubler vs Jordan Thompson — Newport Round of 32

Newport · ATP · Round of 32
AUS
Jason Kubler
#468ATP
1685ELO
1679Grass ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 July 2022
grass
Jordan Thompson
AUS
Jordan Thompson
#309ATP
1772ELO
1709Grass ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
Kubler J.
6-2 6-3
Thompson J.
Kubler J.
662
Thompson J.
230

Jason Kubler defeated Jordan Thompson 6-2 6-3 in the Newport round of 32 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Jordan Thompson came in ranked #309, defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kubler J.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Thompson J.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Kubler J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kubler J.Thompson J.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
54%
Service points won·Even
64%
66%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.2
7.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.1
1.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (143 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kubler J.Thompson J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
59
70
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
97
Break points won·Clear edge
46
24
Deciding sets·Clear edge
79
91
Tiebreaks·Dominant
37
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kubler J.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Thompson J.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.6Grass Elo 1679
Surface ELO
5.4+29 Grass Elo edge
3.9Overall Elo 1685
ELO gap
6.1Overall Elo 1772
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.0
Surface form
5.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
0.0
Minutes 14d
7.7
0.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
8.5
Opponent rise
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Cressy M.[4]
Bublik A.[3]
2-66-37-63
Semi-finals
Bublik A.[3]
Kubler J.
6-36-2
Cressy M.[4]
Isner J.[2]
6-24-66-3
Quarter-finals
Cressy M.[4]
Johnson S.
6-736-46-4
Bublik A.[3]
Murray A.[6]
7-56-4
Isner J.[2]
Bonzi B.[5]
7-626-767-65
Kubler J.
Duckworth J.[8]
7-57-63
R16
Kubler J.
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
4-66-37-64
Isner J.[2]
Gojowczyk P.
6-37-66
Bonzi B.[5]
Eubanks C.
6-47-65
Duckworth J.[8]
Halys Q.
7-53-66-2
Cressy M.[4]
Krueger M.
6-36-4
Johnson S.
Vesely J.[7]
W/O
Bublik A.[3]
Sock J.
6-33-66-2
Murray A.[6]
Purcell M.
4-66-26-1
R32
Bonzi B.[5]
Blumberg W.
2-66-36-2
Duckworth J.[8]
Broady L.
6-24-66-2
Sock J.
Albot R.
6-17-62
Purcell M.
Mannarino A.
6-31-67-5
Murray A.[6]
Querrey S.
6-26-0
Vesely J.[7]
Lopez F.
6-46-2
Eubanks C.
Koepfer D.
6-47-5
Gojowczyk P.
Humbert U.
7-56-4
Krueger M.
Van Rijthoven T.
7-674-66-3
Kubler J.
Thompson J.
6-26-3
Halys Q.
Popyrin A.
7-656-3
Johnson S.
Kozlov S.
7-56-3