Bernabe Zapata Miralles vs Martin Krumich — Amersfoort CH Round of 32

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
ESP3
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
1413ELO
1407Clay ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 July 2022
clay
CZE
Martin Krumich
#282ATP
1459ELO
1423Clay ELO
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLWW
Zapata Miralles B.
5-7 6-2 6-4
Krumich M.
Zapata Miralles B.
5662
Krumich M.
7241

Bernabe Zapata Miralles defeated Martin Krumich 5-7 6-2 6-4 in the Amersfoort CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zapata Miralles B.serving56% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Krumich M.

Krumich M.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Zapata Miralles B.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zapata Miralles B.Krumich M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
62%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
48%
Service points won·Even
57%
60%
Return points won·Even
41%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.6
3.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 122). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zapata Miralles B.Krumich M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
49
24
Break points saved·Even
74
70
Break points won·Dominant
80
53
Deciding sets·Dominant
57
9
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
3
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zapata Miralles B.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Krumich M.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.1Clay Elo 1407
Surface ELO
3.9+16 Clay Elo edge
5.7Overall Elo 1413
ELO gap
4.3Overall Elo 1459
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.8
Surface form
3.6
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
1.9
Minutes 14d
6.7
0.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Zapata Miralles B.Krumich M.
Freshness·
—
79

Krumich M.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 51 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.[1]
Carballes Baena R.[2]
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
6-766-46-3
Griekspoor T.[1]
Gakhov I.
6-23-66-3
Quarter-finals
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Van Assche L.
6-36-4
Gakhov I.
Houkes M.
6-26-747-65
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Daniel T.[5]
6-15-77-63
Griekspoor T.[1]
Sachko V.
6-27-64
R16
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Andreev A.
6-46-4
Daniel T.[5]
Lokoli L.
6-16-2
Gakhov I.
Fils A.
6-36-1
Houkes M.
Taberner C.[4]
6-36-3
Sachko V.
Moraing M.[7]
6-37-66
Griekspoor T.[1]
Piros Z.
6-36-726-3
Van Assche L.
Jong S.
6-06-2
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Lamasine T.
6-16-2
Van Assche L.
Jong A.
6-06-2
R32
Lamasine T.
Kicker N.
7-645-76-3
Andreev A.
Masur D.
7-656-0
Van Assche L.
Bergs Z.[8]
6-34-66-4
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Krumich M.
5-76-26-4
Lokoli L.
Gutierrez O.
6-26-1
Fils A.
Travaglia S.[6]
6-46-2
Taberner C.[4]
Haase R.
7-56-746-2
Moraing M.[7]
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-4
Griekspoor T.[1]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-16-2
Jong S.
Mayot H.
6-47-5
Piros Z.
Ritschard A.
6-17-66
Sachko V.
Collarini A.
6-34-66-4
Gakhov I.
Wassermann D.
6-47-63
Daniel T.[5]
Furness E.
6-25-77-63
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Sels J.
6-46-3
Houkes M.
Skatov T.
7-617-64
Jong A.
Mayot H.
6-47-5