Tristan Lamasine vs Nicolas Kicker — Amersfoort CH Round of 32

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA
Tristan Lamasine
#959ATP
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 July 2022
clay
Nicolas Kicker
ARG
Nicolas Kicker
#327ATP
1385ELO
1373Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWL
Lamasine T.
7-6 5-7 6-3
Kicker N.
Lamasine T.
77562
Kicker N.
64731

Tristan Lamasine defeated Nicolas Kicker 7-6 5-7 6-3 in the Amersfoort CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lamasine T.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Kicker N.

Kicker N.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Lamasine T.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lamasine T.Kicker N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
42%
Break points saved·Even
55%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.6
1.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (128 vs 170). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lamasine T.Kicker N.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
21
30
Break points saved·Clear edge
38
56
Break points won·Dominant
17
45
Deciding sets·Clear edge
51
30
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
43
51

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Lamasine T.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kicker N.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.1
Surface form
6.8
0.0Lost last 6
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
0.0
7.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Lamasine T.Kicker N.
Freshness·
—
100

Kicker N.: 16 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.[1]
Carballes Baena R.[2]
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
6-766-46-3
Griekspoor T.[1]
Gakhov I.
6-23-66-3
Quarter-finals
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Van Assche L.
6-36-4
Gakhov I.
Houkes M.
6-26-747-65
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Daniel T.[5]
6-15-77-63
Griekspoor T.[1]
Sachko V.
6-27-64
R16
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Andreev A.
6-46-4
Daniel T.[5]
Lokoli L.
6-16-2
Gakhov I.
Fils A.
6-36-1
Houkes M.
Taberner C.[4]
6-36-3
Sachko V.
Moraing M.[7]
6-37-66
Griekspoor T.[1]
Piros Z.
6-36-726-3
Van Assche L.
Jong S.
6-06-2
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Lamasine T.
6-16-2
Van Assche L.
Jong A.
6-06-2
R32
Lamasine T.
Kicker N.
7-645-76-3
Andreev A.
Masur D.
7-656-0
Van Assche L.
Bergs Z.[8]
6-34-66-4
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Krumich M.
5-76-26-4
Lokoli L.
Gutierrez O.
6-26-1
Fils A.
Travaglia S.[6]
6-46-2
Taberner C.[4]
Haase R.
7-56-746-2
Moraing M.[7]
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-4
Griekspoor T.[1]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-16-2
Jong S.
Mayot H.
6-47-5
Piros Z.
Ritschard A.
6-17-66
Sachko V.
Collarini A.
6-34-66-4
Gakhov I.
Wassermann D.
6-47-63
Daniel T.[5]
Furness E.
6-25-77-63
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Sels J.
6-46-3
Houkes M.
Skatov T.
7-617-64
Jong A.
Mayot H.
6-47-5