Max Houkes vs Carlos Taberner — Amersfoort CH Round of 16

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
NED
Max Houkes
#239ATP
1460ELO
1444Clay ELO
26 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 July 2022
clay
Carlos Taberner
ESP4
Carlos Taberner
#194ATP
1610ELO
1605Clay ELO
$102kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWLL
Houkes M.
6-3 6-3
Taberner C.
Houkes M.
662
Taberner C.
330

Max Houkes defeated Carlos Taberner 6-3 6-3 in the Amersfoort CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Houkes M.serving56% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Taberner C.

Taberner C.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Houkes M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Houkes M.Taberner C.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
48%
Service points won·Even
59%
59%
Return points won·Even
41%
43%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.6
1.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.1
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (128 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Houkes M.Taberner C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
23
53
Break points saved·Slight edge
66
74
Break points won·Dominant
29
59
Deciding sets·Dominant
34
75
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
16
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Houkes M.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Taberner C.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
3.6Clay Elo 1444
Surface ELO
6.4+161 Clay Elo edge
3.7Overall Elo 1460
ELO gap
6.3Overall Elo 1610
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
2.9
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.5
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Houkes M.Taberner C.
Freshness·
100
—

Houkes M.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.[1]
Carballes Baena R.[2]
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
6-766-46-3
Griekspoor T.[1]
Gakhov I.
6-23-66-3
Quarter-finals
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Van Assche L.
6-36-4
Gakhov I.
Houkes M.
6-26-747-65
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Daniel T.[5]
6-15-77-63
Griekspoor T.[1]
Sachko V.
6-27-64
R16
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Andreev A.
6-46-4
Daniel T.[5]
Lokoli L.
6-16-2
Gakhov I.
Fils A.
6-36-1
Houkes M.
Taberner C.[4]
6-36-3
Sachko V.
Moraing M.[7]
6-37-66
Griekspoor T.[1]
Piros Z.
6-36-726-3
Van Assche L.
Jong S.
6-06-2
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Lamasine T.
6-16-2
Van Assche L.
Jong A.
6-06-2
R32
Lamasine T.
Kicker N.
7-645-76-3
Andreev A.
Masur D.
7-656-0
Van Assche L.
Bergs Z.[8]
6-34-66-4
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Krumich M.
5-76-26-4
Lokoli L.
Gutierrez O.
6-26-1
Fils A.
Travaglia S.[6]
6-46-2
Taberner C.[4]
Haase R.
7-56-746-2
Moraing M.[7]
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-4
Griekspoor T.[1]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-16-2
Jong S.
Mayot H.
6-47-5
Piros Z.
Ritschard A.
6-17-66
Sachko V.
Collarini A.
6-34-66-4
Gakhov I.
Wassermann D.
6-47-63
Daniel T.[5]
Furness E.
6-25-77-63
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Sels J.
6-46-3
Houkes M.
Skatov T.
7-617-64
Jong A.
Mayot H.
6-47-5